Guy Eastman's response to this subject
Randy, what are the issues with filming a hunt on USFS, state, BLM or designated wilderness? What are the costs/fees, as compared to paying for a fully guided hunt?
Grennie:
We have permits for every place we hunted and filmed. How hard is it? You call the agency, talk to the person in charge, download the form, fill it out, send it in with the money, and you have a permit.
Tons of shows don't go through the permit process, taking the risk that they won't get caught. Does it cost money? Yes, but you are using a public resource for a profit purpose, so you should pay a fee.
Is the permit a reason not to film a public land hunt? Not in my mind.
You ask how it compares to the cost of an outfitted hunt. Way cheaper than an outfitted hunt, unless that outfitter gives you the hunt for promo purposes.
You cannot get a permit to film in a wilderness area. If someone is filming in a designated wilderness area, call them in. They are in violation of the filming rules and allowed wilderness activities.
I don't agree with that rule, as I like to think we should be able to promote wildernesses and the opportunities that exist in wilderness hunting, but that is the rule, so no commercial filming in wilderness areas.
Even Robert Redford was denied his request for a wilderness are filming permit when filming Horse Whisperer, here in MT. So, that is one "permit" restriction.
When we encountered that, we filmed on National Forest, just outside of the wilderness area. We had the NF permit, so we hunted right next door. Pretty much the same experience, just not technically in the boundaries of the wilderness area.
Filming guided hunts on exclusive property is fine. Hell, every show does it. Where the rub comes is when people say one thing and do another.
If our show hits the airwaves, I expect the same level of scrutiny. We have turned down a lot of wonderful private land options, to stay true to our concept of non-guided accessible lands.
Our episodes depict experiences that any person could do, if they drew the tag, and gave it the effort. Not what eveyone will want to watch, but we will be the only people doing such in every episode.
Lets face it, the real reason these "controlled environment" hunts are used is that they result in less cost if donated for promo purposes and greater likelihood of success, or greater likelihood of large animals.
Many hosts and production groups couldn't pull it off on public land. That does not apply to the Eastman's group. They have the talent in front and behind the camera to pull it off. Many shows couldn't.
Since these are profit entities, they are trying to maximize profits. To do so, they need the lowest cost for the greatest chance of success on big critters. Controlled environments provide that, and therefore, that is what gets aired
I have no problem with the Eastman's shows being on private land or with outfitters. That is what most shows do. Like I said, the rub being stated here is that what is being promoted and what is being done behind the scenes has some conflict. I don't know them, but I wish them the best of luck, whether they are doing private or public hunts.
But to answer your question, the issue of filming permits has nothing to do with whether or not you would film on public land. They are easy to obtain and the cost is small when compared to the entire production budget. Not sure why that was given as a hurdle for filming on public land.
Now, if I could just get a network to take my bait, eveyone could be throwing stones at me.
