Wow, this has grown a life of its own. Not what I intended when I posted my version of the interactions Wingman and his fellow hunter from Day One.
I had hoped this thread would be about creative ways to access lands normally inaccessible and about a different spin on an On Your Own hunt. Hopefully it will go back to that.
It was too windy for the chopper to get us this morning, so they came in this afternoon. Just walked in the door and now trying to read all of this.
I would encourage Wingman to post his version of events of the evening before opener, and the opening day, if he feels that it is different from what I posted. He may feel his actions were different from what I posted, or he may feel his actions as I posted them were appropriate for a hunt on public land. If so, he and I will just have to disagree on that.
If he does feel it necessary to post his accounts of that day to dispell what I have posted, or to try dismiss conclusions that others have drawn of him from his short time here on the site, that would be welcomed.
BRNG has asked some questions, which I think were pointed to me, so I will take the time to answer them.
I am new to this site and after reading the reply's on this thread I have to ask the question. It appears that most on this thread agree that wingman is an unethical hunter based soley on the word of Big Fin.
I did not use the word "unethical." I think I used the term "least respectful" and stand by that assessment now, and will forever. I suspect the guys here are some of the most serious hunters around, and base their opinions on much more than what I say or type. Here is the quote I provided, and it does not use the word "unethical."
Big Fin said:
In their quest to shoot the biggest bull around, they have proven to be some of the least respectful hunters I have ever encountered. If they read this and email me, I can send them the entire audio track of the discussion.
It is public land, so we all have the same right to be here. Just takes a different kind of hunter to buzz a camp, know exactly where it is, then come and set up right in the middle of that location, within a couple hundred yards of the camp and those hunters. Hope you get your bull, M***.
To me, that was the end of worrying about it. The following day, when they had shot their bull, I posted that such was "good for them," even if by complete happenstance, there good fortune and hard work resulted in our opportunity not coming together. Them being in that spot was a complete accident, and happens on public land. Here is my quote of the events of that day.
Big Fin said:
I walk over the ridge to our left to see what the cow smelled/ saw. The two guys from yesterday were there. Good for them to have shot a bull.
I thought that would be the end of it, only to find Wingman registered and posting here, which is just fine with me.
BRNG 525=BRNG 525 said:
I don't know Big Fin, he is probably a great guy and an avid hunter but from what I have read he also flew into this spot with a helicopter. How did he find the spot, I know where he was hunting and I also know for a fact that this particular piece of land is land locked by private property so some scouting must have been done on his part in order for him to get there int he first place.
Here is how I found the spot. I know many people who have hunted the general area on both public and private land. They have told me of the quality of elk there and the fact that most reside on private land. Five years ago I started to apply there. Gave up on it for a year and then applied again this year.
For you to assume that
some scouting must have been done on his part in order for him to get there int he first place would be incorrect, other than the scouting I did from my desk. We went in cold. But, if I ever go in again, I have learned a lot from this trip.
BRNG 525 said:
If wingman was in the area trying to recover a bull he had stuck previously with a bow, wouldn't this be considered the ethical thing to do. I teach my kids that they need to exhaust all possibilities, within the boundaries of the law, to recover an animal that we shoot. Maybe he was fling low to try and find this bull to try and do the ethical thing.
Maybe. But, with us (our group on the ground and him from the air) having just seen the bull the night before, and the bull was doing perfectly fine, I doubt the reason for going after the bull was mercy and ethics. He made it pretty clear that he was sitting in front of us for the purpose of shooting THAT bull, a bull which I don't fault him for wanting to shoot - it was a huge bull. But, I suspect it was not out of concern of finishing off a wounded bull. Again, that is just my opinion from that conversation.
BRNG 525 said:
Maybe he's a poacher, who knows I don't and neither do you.
I don't know where anyone said that. I have not had time to read every post by every person.
BRNG 525 said:
Why didn't Big Fin ask if he could assist wingman in any way to try and help him find the wounded bull instead of bashing him on his website. Wouldn't that have been the ethical thing to do? All I am saying is there is always two sides to every story!
I don't find my recounting the events as they happened, from my perspective, to be bashing. If you do, that is your prerogative.
The reason I wasn't too worried about finding the wounded bull, was because we all saw the bull the night before, and he was just fine. If I encountered another hunter in search of a recently wounded animal, I would do what I can to help.
When that person does a flyover of our camp, looks over all the elk from the air the evening before, then comes and plants himself right in front of us and within site of what he knows to be our camp, I am not too concerned about helping him.
And when he tells me he hit a bull in archery season, a season that had been closed for six days, I don't expect a mortally wounded bull to still be running the hills six days later.
So, I would disagree with you that in that situation, the ethical thing would have been to drop my hunt and
"assist wingman in any way to try and help him find the wounded bull ....."
If that is what you would have done in that situation, good on you. Just not what I would do.
BRNG 525 said:
All I am saying is there is always two sides to every story!
I agree that there are two sides to every story. Wingman had plenty of opportunity to post his and may yet do so.
If that is all you are saying, it took you a lot of other words and interjections to get there.
I hope this is the end of all this drama. Really not constructive. If Wingman feels compelled to tell his side of the events, he is more than capable of doing so.
Until then, I apologize that this thread got out of hand. Hopefully it will continue, but with a more constructive tone.