Part of the problem is there are no other prey animals for the coyotes to dine on..like rabbits, all time lows, mouse numbers are lower than normal....
Is someone doing mouse surveys? Not looking to argue, just wondering where you got the info.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Part of the problem is there are no other prey animals for the coyotes to dine on..like rabbits, all time lows, mouse numbers are lower than normal....
Too bad a lot of decisions are made without consulting a biologist.
Show me the science.
Not trying to fight, but if you find some biologist that scientifically came out against ANY predators in Montana, I want to read that report/study.
How many years has it been that there is no scientific evidence that wolves have had any effects on Montana elk herds. I attended and sat in way too many meetings, and read way too many reports on wolves from the time they were doing studies to introduce the wolves to the years following. Biologists studies come out with many wishy washy variables and nothing substantial - drought, bad winters, lack of normal forage, etc. etc.
Now tell me or show me any studies that black bears, grizzlies, or mountain lions have any major effects on game herds from a scientific study in Montana. These damn creatures have been studied more than a new playboy magazine in a locker room and what have we got for results. NO SCIENCE. So, using your repeated comment of "Show me the science" has absolutely no credibilty with me. Why - because it don't exist. I for one have a liitle different attitude on bears, cats and wolves then the science shows.
I believe it was Miller that made a comment that went something like - So you asked a guy if his job was valid, and you got what? I'll give you my opinion "NO SCIENCE".
I am not a wolf, bear, cat, and/or coyote hater but with all the variables thrown at our wildlife herds here in Montana, along with all the bills the nuts up in Helana are throwing at the equation - it is time to start balancing our wildlife herds with predators high on the scale, not put on the bottom of the scale because someone can't "Show me the science".
Oh yea - I forgot - cats ain't a predator in the eyes of our Montana system.
I sorta recall a post about that project, but am too lazy to look it up. Care to give a 'Cliff-notes' version of the causes?But then we look at the Absoroka Elk Ecology project and we see that nutritional content of forage on public land is leading to poor body conditions for females which lead to less calves, and more vulnerable elk so that predation can rise.
Actually the science does exist,
Wolves and lions and bears are different: The study in the Bitterroot has shown that Lions are doing most of the predation when it comes to elk. Bears take themajority of elk calves.
Show me the science.
If you're seeing so many coyotes on a daily basis I hope you're burning through lots of ammo.
Well then - show me the report.
Lighten up Ben - we're all looking to better things but at times some have a more open mind than others.
If you want to read an interesting "scientific biologist report" on mountain lion in the breaks, read todays Billings Gazette. I admit that some editor wrote it but he sure as hell got his info from a biologist. Bottom line is - send a biologist out on a project and report back. They report back that they ran into this, this, and this. None of which is relevant BUT they came up with a dozen more studies that need to be done before any further questions can be brought up to study at a future date. That's what is known as creating your own job security - or in business we refer to it as pole vaulting over mouse chit and not getting anything done, "paralysis by analysis".
I'm not going to argue with you that it is economically feasible to try and wack every coyote out there - but you come across like no coyote would ever consider eating a fawn.
It's been said a gazillion times that if the big a-bomb would fall the only thing that would crawl out of the ruble would be a couple male and female coyotes - and that may not be too far fetched.
A little more coyote control sure as hell wouldn't hurt.
I sorta recall a post about that project, but am too lazy to look it up. Care to give a 'Cliff-notes' version of the causes?
Sorry I wasn't more clear. Did they provide the causes for the decrease in nutrition in the forage? Change to a lower quality species? Same species, but they are less nutritious than in the past?Elk on public ground suffer from malnutrition due to poor forage quality.
Lower body condition leads to less pregnancies
Fewer pregnancies means fewer elk
Poor body condition leads to "weak" animals = easier pickings for woofs
elk that select crops = better body condition, higher pregnancy rates, better suited to avoiding woofs & Bars.
Elk on public ground suffer from malnutrition due to poor forage quality