I've been trying to give away a ziplock of .323" flat nose spizters. You want 'em?
-
Thank you for creating an account on Hunt Talk! We require that all new users contribute at least 10 posts before gaining the ability to start new threads. Once you have made 10 posts, you will be able to start new threads in the forum.
-
Haven't tried 200's....again, IMO. stretching would be inhibited in the Montana's magwell. 2900 for a 200 might be a feat Ben. Think the heaviest I loaded were some 185 VLD & don't recall the fps....wanted to test some 190 AB's but they never became available during my CDS ballistic run up recipe days. Now a 300 win mag might be a better choice if 200gr is your benchmark.
How a preference for a particular type of gun turns into a cat fight about someone being better than someone else, is one of the reasons I have almost quit posting on the Campfire. It appears it is as
bad over here. If I use a nice gun in rough country, it isn't as rough as theirs. No winning here...Ben, thanks for your response. It's nice to be able to have a conversation with someone who has some opposing views, that remains civil. Keep the pictures coming. They help ease the wait for someone who gets to spend but a few short weeks each year in your beautiful state.Tom, check out this link: http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-h1126/show
I searched the document for "HR1126" "H.R.1126" "H.R. 1126" and "public lands" and nothing turns up?
Ben, heard back from one of the Mauser Central administrators who said he had a converted M1888. He said the grooves had been opened up to .323 and a notch had been placed on the rear of the receiver ring as was done to '98's which were converted to 30-06. Probably would still be advisable to have a smith slug the bore and mike everything well. Good luck. RT
Haha! Classic link... Ya, I would not want this tool representing us as well... (j/k
) All joking aside, really appreciate your time and effort representing our interests. Thank you! -
Loading…
-
Loading…
-
Loading…
