Changes to ESA rules

[shootbrownelk]

Next up, bringing back DDT...

Nuke the Condors!

 

[Forkyfinder]

It was their idea after all and they now have the power.

Is it about keeping score for you? The reality is the abuse of the EAJA and the ESA. Who are the primary perpetrators of that again? Who benefit$ from that and who fund it?

Not really unique to this issue either. Typically the benefits are connected to the funding fronting as something else, ie dark money political groups benefitting their constituents.

The same incestuous nature of the corruption in the GOP exists on the left. And democrats are just as blind to it as maga.

 

[SAJ-99]

Is it about keeping score for you? The reality is the abuse of the EAJA and the ESA. Who are the primary perpetrators of that again? Who benefit$ from that and who fund it?

Not at all about keeping score. Just trying to explain why it hasn’t been fixed to date. My point is I don’t think you understand the scope of how the EAJA is used by various groups. And you can also look at political contributions by the offenders. Yes they are party specific, but the $ amount isn’t much. Like I said, let’s see what happens in committee. I will write my rep and express some support for it.

 

[Forkyfinder]

Just trying to explain why it hasn’t been fixed to date.

It hasnt been fixed to date - because a single party special interest is a major beneficiary. I'll acknowledge in advance - no different than a number of issues on the other side of the coin.

 

[El Jason]

The EAJA is a different topic. The issue here is the fact habitat alterations are no longer considered “harm” to an ESA species.

 

[Forkyfinder]

The issue here is the fact habitat alterations are no longer considered “harm” to an ESA species.

What litigation could possibly be the motive, for a change?

 

[El Jason]

What litigation could possibly be the motive, for a change?

I don’t know specifically what you are asking.