Changes to ESA rules

Paying attention to and making sure we implemented both state and federal laws related to rare species was something I dealt with over 3+ decades.

What I think many dont realize is how much overlap there is in habitat needs between species we hunt and rare species. Common to see overlap.

And as always, some neglect to consider the long view when the pendulum swings so far away from protection.

When political power shifts--that pendulum can swing back further the other way.

Theres a need for balance. Inserting politics encourages a move to the extremes.
 
Last edited:
Many game species do that too though, and states have figured out how to work together and manage them pretty well.
Common species whose population is not threatened by human actions have less...or zeto...need to work across state lines.

Having worked in that arena for decades, I can say we didnt work across state lines to coordinate with neighbors on regulations for species that arent rare.

Kind of wish we did for deer as Chronic Wasting Disease has grown in my state due in large part to lack of control by our neighboring states.
 
If the states had done their work, then the species wouldn't be in need of a federal law to keep them from going extinct. I'm all for state management, but let's be real about why there are overarching federal laws like this.
I and my colleagues made this case for years: the work to keep a species viable and away from listing consideration is minor in comparison to what you are forced into once a species is listed.
 
I'm all for state management, but let's be real about why there are overarching federal laws like this.

I think it may be because some species are politically/financially expedient for states to manage, while others are not.

I’m not sure it has much to do with capability.
 
Last edited:
Environmental law is sure shaping up to be a busy field to work in!
This follows along that line. It is basically no change because they didn't remove Grizzlies from the ESL. I'm sure some will say this is great news, but it has long-term implications that fit with trying to get rid of the DOI in total.

 
Thanks - this has also stopped good projects (logging and controlled burn), that im not so sure make habitat worse (for both species) in the long term.

Earthjustice got their lawyers full pockets and forest service employee time wasted. What the public and wildlife get?



I'm all for reform of the EAJA, but I'm surprised at how little the serial litigants are awarded through the process. Pretty sure for most of the groups, the award pales in comparison to donations. And certainly court victories are used to raise funds.

 
This follows along that line. It is basically no change because they didn't remove Grizzlies from the ESL. I'm sure some will say this is great news, but it has long-term implications that fit with trying to get rid of the DOI in total.

Tin foil alert!
 
This follows along that line. It is basically no change because they didn't remove Grizzlies from the ESL. I'm sure some will say this is great news, but it has long-term implications that fit with trying to get rid of the DOI in total.

Interesting.

MN has had far more Wolves than recovery goals for decades longer than any western state has for Griz I believe. Has any westeen state met and exceeded Griz goals for 40 years?

We've had a management plan in place for years as well --that will kick in as soon as managenent gets returned to the state..one that considered a broad variety of public views and concerns.

Everyone in the resource management realm here accepts that wolves have long been recovered here.

But Im not holding out any hope they will extend this exact same rationale here.. at least not until after early November.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
119,581
Messages
2,230,870
Members
38,931
Latest member
coloelk52
Back
Top