Nemont
Well-known member
I have been spending some time arguing with a guy over on MM.com.
How many of you think a plan like that listed below would ever get serious consideration and pass in a legislative body?
Here is the thread.
http://www.monstermuleys.info/dcforum/DCForumID5/20596.html#
Please tell me your opinions. I suspect I know but feel free to share.
How many of you think a plan like that listed below would ever get serious consideration and pass in a legislative body?
Here is the thread.
http://www.monstermuleys.info/dcforum/DCForumID5/20596.html#
1. Pull all the tags for a single species off the table.
2. Get biologists to develop management plans for each zone.
3. Most importantly develop a number for the total number of males and females of each species to be harvested from each zone.
4. Use an actual economist to set the price for the new tags for the species and adjust prices for individuals in certain zones.
5. Do not gamble on what percentage of hunters eat "tag soup" anymore. Account for %100 fatality with each tag sold.
6. Put all tags up for sale for one month at the set price. At the end of the one month any tags left over go up for auction. Starting bid is $1. Economist will reset price each year depending on the tag sales from the previous year.
7. Hunters who aquire tag have the entire year to kill their animal. No rules set by the state on how they do it as long as they comply with land laws and firearm laws. If you want to use a helicopter, spotlight, laser sights, the state no longer cares. Game wardens only look for animals killed without a tag or not within the tag's zone. It will no longer matter to the state how the deer was killed because the state already accounts for %100 tag mortality in their wildlife plan. Let the hunting clubs like Boone and Crockett start policing themselves instead of counting on the states to do so.
8. The next year repeat with another game species.
Please tell me your opinions. I suspect I know but feel free to share.