Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Funny enough. Now that i spelled it all out jn terms of miles and vert out loud - all of a sudden i am thinking that it wont be too crowded.
So is general consensus that 5 miles is far enough to leave 80-90% of people behind?
And are horse/mule people not that large in numbers or get spread out more?
thanks
my piece of advice, don't put all your eggs in one basket
it's a short season, so realistically it would be hard to hit more than two, but having all of them mapped out and basic mental understanding of where and what i would do there is huge when areas aren't working the way you hoped
Luck has nothing to do with what bb307 is suggesting. If miles traveled trips your trigger then have at. Cant imagine how many dozens of elk you are walking passed in that 4-5 mile trip into camp. Or how many hundreds you are driving passed on that drive to the trailhead. You have been given some solid advice on this thread from several people. How many miles to cover before you start hunting isn't one of them.i hear that, and yes one can get lucky and have elk walk just past your car-camp set up and you could take it.
i am looking to increase my chances in every and any way possible. i also dont want to deal with what i saw last year: for the first mile or so, on the opening morning hiking in, there was a guy shining a light at me from behind some tree every 50 yards, just dont want to deal with crowds around me.
if being further away from crowds, allows for less pressure, more elk, and and gives me higher success rate chance, then thats what i'm after.
so while getting lucky a mile is happens every year for some, its not what i'm after.
If you want the horse perspective 7-10 miles with a couple steep grades is the sweet spot. Reason being that you can pack a camp in and get back out to the trailhead with 6 head of horses in an 8 hour day. If you are gonna hunt on horseback you have a 6 mile range and you can go out to 10 from camp if it looks good. If you want to get away from the horses go where its dry and steep.
Yep. Got gotta be where the people aren't. Oftentimes that means going deep. If a guy's smart though, he can get creative and find the sanctuaries that aren't 7 miles deep. There's a lot more of them than you'd think.
In 2018 I killed a bull in the flat tops. 1st rifle heard a group of around 40 with bugling bulls. Around 1.5 miles from where I parked. No trails, over two hills, over or around downed logs everywhere. The pack out was brutal.
On a trip in the wilderness this summer I also saw over 100 elk around 8 miles from a trailhead. This pack out would be almost all downhill and easier.
totally agree that much of advice given is great and true. but not all of it was answering a specific questions.Luck has nothing to do with what bb307 is suggesting. If miles traveled trips your trigger then have at. Cant imagine how many dozens of elk you are walking passed in that 4-5 mile trip into camp. Or how many hundreds you are driving passed on that drive to the trailhead. You have been given some solid advice on this thread from several people. How many miles to cover before you start hunting isn't one of them.
I'd say its more of a combination of miles on trail, then off trail, then steep/nastiness.
You can get 1 mile off a trail 1 mile from the truck when it's nasty and you will be all alone. For good reason![]()
Horses are completely foreign to me. I bet horse hunters look at 15 miles like it's a day hunt. Must be pretty cool.
If you are talking 15 miles in and then back,,,while doable if your horse is in good shape,, that kind of ride is not the way I do it. Normally the ride in for me is anywhere from 1.5 miles to maybe 6. If you can't find elk somewhere in those parameters,,, it isn't a very good area.
Well I was being a bit hyperbolic. Just remembering how easily folks on horseback blow by me on the trail!
My favorite spot in UT is on a ridge. It’s an easy 1.5 mile hike in on an easily accessible trail, and then the trail splits and goes up two separate canyons, each an easy flat trail along creeks. In between is a steep incline up to a ridge with no trail. Most people head up one of those two canyons. I head straight up that incline. It’s 1/4 mile of Hell (just under 800’ of vertical), and then flattens out a bit after that with a few open meadows where lots of game hang out. So I hunt those meadows, and I can also glass a lot of terrain from up there in case I need to go chase them somewhere else. I have trail cams up there year round and can count the number of people I see up there per year on one hand. But I get moose, elk, deer and coyote pics almost daily. It’s only ~2.5 miles in, but I think people get to the fork and see two easy options and one really hard one, and generally pick one of the two easy ones. The faces of the ridge are steep on both sides, so there’s not really a place where one would naturally look up from one of the trails and say “I think I’ll climb up there”. It just looks too gnarly. It literally sucks getting up there, but once on top, it’s a great spot. I’m surprised that other people don’t go there because it’s pretty obvious using any mapping app that it’s got good potential. I really think it’s all about the proverbial choice at the fork in the road. People see 2 options, not 3. I’m glad for it to stay that wayI'd say its more of a combination of miles on trail, then off trail, then steep/nastiness.
You can get 1 mile off a trail 1 mile from the truck when it's nasty and you will be all alone. For good reason![]()