SAJ-99
Well-known member
After listening to @Big Fin and Corey on Elk Talk discuss habitat management and the Roadless Rules and Randy saying “we still have the ESA”, I wonder if this changes his mind at all? Under the new definition of harm you just have to show you don’t kill the endangered animal directly. Habitat changes will be given a lot of flexibility.
The Center for Biological Diversity is suing and I have to say I’m rooting for them on this one. We somehow have to find a better way of doing this than court battles, but right now that seems to be the only tool.
www.doi.gov
The Center for Biological Diversity is suing and I have to say I’m rooting for them on this one. We somehow have to find a better way of doing this than court battles, but right now that seems to be the only tool.
Department of the Interior Restores Clear ESA Enforcement by Rescinding Misguided “Harm” Definition | U.S. Department of the Interior
The Department of the Interior and the Department of Commerce today announced they have finalized a rule rescinding the outdated regulatory definition of “harm” under the Endangered Species Act.
