El Jason
Well-known member
That’s what I thought.No way. I worked for a living.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That’s what I thought.No way. I worked for a living.
When you work for the money you are investing, you are a lot more careful with it.
They were closer to 30k when I turned 40. 15k when I first started looking around 1996. Buzz is 60. He should have a wall full.That math get a bit fuzzy too though/ if said person spent $10k on that hunt when they were 40, it has an opportunity cost of about $100k when they are 60.
*assuming the alternative was investing it in an S&P 500 index fund (which is way less cool).
Is Stone's sheep addiction an acceptable reply?
I did "advise" my own children. Both of them owned their own fully paid for homes by about 30,
No, I'm not 60.They were closer to 30k when I turned 40. 15k when I first started looking around 1996. Buzz is 60. He should have a wall full.
This is a ridiculous statement. I’ve watched coworkers work hard for money and blow it.When you work for the money you are investing, you are a lot more careful with it.
The U.S. is not number 1 in many favorable catagories...which is counter intuitive considering the tremendous wealth.Im the definition of living within your means and currently have a good job, but its not easy for people to raise a family and pay bills nowdays. Things have increased greatly due to quantative easing and free money printing under Bush, Osama, Trump, Obiden, and Dumpster 2.0. Its very difficult on a single person or single parents to ever get ahead, but we are light years more blessed than most of the other countries
The U.S. is not number 1 in many favorable catagories...
Debt is one way to get tax breaks.I’m not totally sure what this means. But I work in finance and the wealthiest people I analyze have loads and loads of debt. Total assets obviously outweigh, but the ultra wealthy have no aversion to debt.