Shall not be infringed.
The writers of that new first hand what massive government tyranny looked like.
They knew what the imbalance of weaponry looked like.
So is none a good answer?
But to be fair, I'm also for public hangings of school shooters, gang shooters, domestic violence shooters, etc.
This splitting hairs argument shows how stupid we've become in modern society.
Ban AR, allow mini 14.
Ban AR, allow M1
BAN AR, allow BAR
Ban AR, allow 10mm
What's sillier to me, is that gun owners, who understand guns, play into it.
A Benelli black eagle with a expanded mag, would do more damage in a classroom than an AR. 10 shots of 00 12ga in a classroom?
My son runs a Ruger predator .223, that holds AR 10 shot mags. That in a school, does nearly the same as the AR, yeah a little slower, but are we really arguing about rate of fire?
The gun control debate is made by COWARDS too afraid to address major cultural deficiency. To COWARDLY to stand up to the lefts embrace of narcotics and mental illness.
As a gun owner do you TRULY believe a school shooter will not shoot up a school because AR are banned? Truly? The GUN makes them do it? Or, if we ban AR and 2 fewer kids get killed due to rate of fire, that's a win?
I'm 49. I've carried guns in my vehicles since I was 16. We all had shotguns, at school, all fall. No one I knew had gun safes, a few had gun cabinets, but most had racks on the walls, or a closet.
And, there weren't school shootings.
You don't treat cancer by cutting off the patients hair, you attack the tumor.
Our society is degrading. It's not coincidence that as that happens, shootings increase.