RECORD ELK HARVEST IN CO!!!!!...here we go again......

D

Deerslayer

Guest
...here we go again!.......turns out the final numbers were good!

COLORADO ENJOYS RECORD HARVEST!!!!!!!
Hunters who participated in Colorado’s 2002 big game season recorded a new record elk harvest of 61,174 edging the old record of 60,120 set in 2000. But the Division of Wildlife’s (DOW) game managers emphasized that the Colorado’s elk herd is still over the long-term population objectives in many areas. They are reminding hunters that a large number of antlerless elk licenses will again be available in 2003, and that in some cases, hunters will be able to hold more than one license so long as at least one of those licenses is an antlerless license. The record harvest is good news for the state’s range. The grasses and forbes that sustain wildlife have been stressed by severe drought conditions while supporting a growing herd of elk for the past several years. While there are some areas in the state where elk populations are at objective, there are other areas where population levels are above the levels needed to maintain healthy range conditions. In an effort to maintain or improve range conditions, the DOW issued a record number of antlerless elk licenses in hopes that the elk harvest would exceed 60,000. Hunters did their part by killing more than 60,000 elk. With 229,629 elk licenses sold, it can be assumed that more than 215,000 sportsmen hunted elk last year in Colorado. The number of hunters is less than the number of licenses, due to the opportunity to buy more than one elk license in some cases. Colorado hunters enjoyed a 27 percent statewide success rate — the best in nearly three decades — but work remains to be done if the state’s range is to remain in good condition. “The drought conditions that have persisted through the past couple of years have caused wildlife managers to reassess our harvest and herd objectives for elk,” said Rick Kahn, terrestrial section’s field management supervisor for the DOW. “There may well be less habitat and food available now than 3 years ago. This can result in more conflicts with private land, more conflicts between species such as elk and mule deer and a potential reduction in the overall condition of the animals. “We need to maintain our cow harvests in a number of units and in some herds increase cow harvest in order to prevent long-term damage to the land base,” Kahn said. The White River National Forest elk herd is one example because the elk populations has remained well above the DOW’s population objective. The herd occupies game management units (GMU’s) 11, 12, 13, 23, 24, 25, 26, 33, 34, 133, 211 and 231 in northwestern Colorado. Hunters killed 12,170 elk in these GMU’s and averaged a 31 percent success rate, well above average. Hunters in GMU’s 211 and 13 enjoyed phenomenal success rates of 51 percent and 54 percent respectively. These numbers include all manners of take and all seasons valid in the area. Of the 61,000 plus elk harvested in 2002, 27 percent came from these GMU’s meaning harvest objectives for this area were met for the first time in several years. There were 7,038 elk killed in the GMU’s north of Craig (3, 301, 4, 5, 214 and 14). Hunters had an average 39 percent success rate in these GMU’s with 50 percent of the hunters in GMU 441 being successful. Ron Velarde, northwest regional manager for the DOW, says that these harvest numbers demonstrate the DOW’s ability to manage elk in these areas that are over objective. “We’re excited about it,” Velarde said. “We proved we can harvest elk and meet harvest objectives. We were asked to think outside of the box and develop some tools that would get us to harvest objectives, and that was accomplished. I see this only getting better in the future as we refine and add to these tools.” Hunters killed 1,630 elk and were successful on average 36 percent of the time in GMU’s 61 and 62, south of Grand Junction. GMU’s 66 and 67, south of Gunnison provided 4,437 elk for hunters and a 40 percent success rate. The continuing need to reduce elk numbers in certain areas of the state will mean additional opportunities for hunters. Last year, the price of nonresident antlerless elk licenses was reduced significantly and other regulations were changed in an effort to reduce elk herds in specific areas of the state. Even more opportunities will be available for hunters this year as the DOW streamlines and adds to the management practices that proved successful last season. “We may have to evaluate our methods for distributing cow licenses to make sure we can maintain the needed harvest in spite of weather, economic factors and private land access,” Kahn said. “These are conditions the DOW does not control. We are experimenting with over-the-counter antlerless elk licenses in two areas this fall to evaluate this tool. We’re also continuing our efforts to maximize early and late seasons to harvest elk. The DOW needs to better understand why hunters hunt antlerless elk, what motivates them and what incentives are needed to make the most of this critical management tool.” According to Kahn, keeping harvest rates high enough to maintain hunting an effective wildlife management tool takes cooperation from a number of groups — and Mother Nature has a say also. None of these variables helped with the 2001 elk harvest. Poor economic factors, poor weather conditions for hunting and an increase in the cost of licenses led to fewer than 200,000 hunters taking only 42,630 for a 21 percent success rate in 2001. “It take a significant effort from the DOW, private land owners, hunters and the federal land management agencies to maintain a harvest of more than 60,000 elk,” Kahn said. “It also requires some luck in terms of weather — it can’t be too hot and dry and there can’t get too much snow early in the season.” Deer hunters were successful in 2002 also with more than 80,000 hunters killing more than 35,000 deer for a success rate of 44 percent. There were 32,634 deer taken in 2001.
 

Westman

New member
Joined
Feb 7, 2001
Messages
212
Location
Midwest
Sure as heck wasn't due to any damage our group did.


Congrats to those that had sucess!
 

Boman

New member
Joined
Jan 24, 2002
Messages
337
Location
Colorado
Not from my group either... we were skunked.. I think DS and Anaconda got em all! I gotta say I was pretty surprised to hear how many were taken. I would have guessed around 45-55K not 60+. How do you guys think this will affect any drought or predation tags?

<FONT COLOR="#800080" SIZE="1">[ 03-10-2003 08:11: Message edited by: Boman ]</font>
 
D

Deerslayer

Guest
Bo.....they said in the article for hunters to expect the extra tags again this year.

The other topic on "Co harvest falls short" was when they were not quite done tallying the final numbers on the late season. They thought they would fall about 5 or 10 thousand short...but seems they just edged over the top......
DS
 

Elkmtb

New member
Joined
Dec 29, 2002
Messages
111
Location
Texas
I smell a rat.

Everyone I talked to said it was a bad year. They must have counted all the deer/elk they killed on ranches for CWD and on the roads. Either that or there was a masacer on winter lands during late season.

Anyone have access to how many bulls were killed vs last year? Sounds like the DOW subscribes to the democratic method of counting.
 

Desert Sheep

Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2001
Messages
93
Location
Colorado
The CO DOW web site now has the harvest stats from last season for the different species. (except deer isn't posted yet)

Granted, they get most of their information from a hunter phone survey, but I have hunted here for the last 9 years I have yet to be called.

Here's the link to their stats page.
http://wildlife.state.co.us/huntrecap/
 

Boman

New member
Joined
Jan 24, 2002
Messages
337
Location
Colorado
I kind of have to agree with elkmtb on this one... Where did the extra harvest come from?? I know their aren't that many late season hunts goin on...So what's the deal? Come on DS help us misguided fools...

<FONT COLOR="#800080" SIZE="1">[ 03-10-2003 16:33: Message edited by: Boman ]</font>
 
D

Deerslayer

Guest
LOL!...me too Dan! She thought I was shitting when I told her we smacked four and were looking for more!

I can tell you this...the late seasons WERE a masacre! You boys have to stop shooting your wads early and bide your time...........but you won't. You will be back out next year the first two seasons....
........can't wait to .....well......get skunked
 

Westman

New member
Joined
Feb 7, 2001
Messages
212
Location
Midwest
DS,

We went to a brand new area on the edge of the wilderness and ended up in ATV heaven. This was during 3rd season. We had no way to access the wilderness because we ended up in the wrong place to do that. We would be in a different place next year but won't go back there due to all the people who violated the wilderness rule with ATV's.

We spent the last two days of the season trying to get camp and rig out on 18 miles of snowed in roads.

Not the best of times, but what the heck!

Take care.....
 
D

Deerslayer

Guest
Dang it Bill......don't ya just hate that shit!
.......it's enough to make a fella want to sign up with Buzz's "Coalition to Ban ATV's"..or the CBA
CO seems to be one of the worst state's for abuse.
It can be tough to get away from the "joy riders"


...so what part of the state were you guys in? Let me know and I might can help point you to a new area if your interested.....
DS
 

Mountain Boomer

New member
Joined
Dec 10, 2000
Messages
336
Location
Arkansas
Hey DS, I would take all the pointing you can point if you would. My dad and I are planning on coming out there in September to bowhunt. Haven't a clue where to go. Just now starting my reasearch. I would appreciate any help you could give.
 

RANDALL K

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2002
Messages
92
Location
Rapid City, SD
I know last years record elk harvest wasn't because of me
!

Hopefully this year will be different, already made plans
(even though DS helped me to partially fill the "void" in my freezer, there's still a lot of empty space in it). In this years regulations the DOW explains about getting multiple tags, and this is the first year they've had "antlerless tags" for archery season, in addition to the "either sex" tags (kinda makes me wish I didn't have school this fall). But, like DOW said, the herd is beyond capacity, so extra tags will be the "norm" again this year (I sure hope that means successful
).
 

Oak

Expert
Joined
Dec 23, 2000
Messages
12,406
Location
Colorado
Well, I went two-for-two last year, and told 'em so when they called me. Maybe the numbers are so high because they only called the successful ones?


Oak
 

taz1001

New member
Joined
Jun 14, 2001
Messages
5
Location
Longmont, CO
Had 5 and 6 point bulls all over the place during 3rd season. Saw some real dandy (300+ or so B&C) bulls. Didn't shoot because of poor angles, trees/brush, or not the "right" bull. I like when I can be picky and do not regret ever going home without meat, antlers, and hair. Just being close to big bulls is huge rush. The later seasons went equally well. Hung out with large groups of cows and bulls every day. I like to walk and talk with them. They don't seem to mind your presence, as long as you don't look directly at them (into their eyes) and you keep talking to them with several cow calls. Finally shot a cow at 30 feet from a herd of 50 or so on the fourth day of the last season.

I was called for input on my antelope hunt, but not the elk hunts. I would have told them the this and last year's seasons did not appear to be as crowded as pre 2001 seasons, conditions were almost perfect, and the animals plentiful.
 
D

Deerslayer

Guest
Mountain Boomer.....give me a few days and I'll work you something up and send it to you.....
DS
 
Top