I'm pretty close to an absolutist when it comes to the Constitutional right to bear arms, and any other Constitutional right.
As for 2A, it's pretty simple. Only two generations, my Dad and my Grandmother, separate me from a person, my great grandfather, who had to leave his home country (Finland) to escape tyranny of the Russians. He felt the inability of Finns to resist the Russification efforts was in large part due to the populous not being well armed. So in 1913, he came to the US rather than be conscripted to the Russian Army.
It was told that he was amazed that in the US he could own firearms without restriction. He had many firearms. Most family pictures have a rack of long guns in the background. If not for a fire at my Dad's house, I would be in possession of a couple of his old guns.
His oldest daughter, my grandmother, told me that until the day he died her father proclaimed he would never again be without firearms. She also stated her father would never be "peaceably disarmed." Nor will I.
Based on that personal connection and being a student of history, I remain convinced that a well-armed citizenry is essential to a society based on individual Constitutional rights that political leaders are inherently inclined to abuse when they gain the power vested in our government institutions.
If I lived in New Mexico, the Gov could KMA. And so could anyone trying to enforce such a BS executive proclamation.