That level of stupidity exists regardless of this legislation. I don't think this legislation will make anyone more or less stupid.
i see where you're coming from on all this.
but i can't help but think a law that specifically states "is justified in using reasonable and appropriate physical force" and "to the extent that it is reasonably necessary to
terminate what the owner .... reasonably
believes to be the commission of a criminal trespass" we have a problem.
the bolded words are what already cranky landowners want to see and will see. you can put the words "reasonable" and "reasonably" in the bill a thousand times over but that's what people will see. we have quite a few examples of landowners getting very boldly in peoples faces in wyoming
believing they have exclusive rights to land that they don't.
if this bill only results in one landowner feeling empowered to vigilantism simply because he
believes he's right, than that's still too many. from watching afar it seems there are lots of landowners that truly "believe" people are trespassing on land that they're actually allowed on. if just a few falsely interpret and
believe just a little bit that the law is more on their side, that may be more empowerment than we want.
tldr: i suspect there are plenty of landowners who will not
reasonably interpret this bill. 99% of em won't even read it. they'll just hear about it. what i'm really worried about is the landowners that already harass people who aren't trespassing. they're already clearly confused or willfully ignorant on the current law; if they feel even a inch more empowered that's really bad.