krshunter,
I think I know what HMA's you're talking about and it makes sense the way the G&F does them.
I think it may be wise for you to not just think of yourself, think big-picture.
On top of that, be thankful that the landowners agree to let you hunt at all. Remember, they're doing this by CHOICE, they dont owe you anything.
Its not a crock of shit, its a fair way to make sure that every hunter has a quality hunt. You have to choose one or the other large HMA's in the area, but cant hold a permit for both. Each HMA has only a set number of permission slips given out, if you could have one for both areas, you'd likely never hunt both. The reason for splitting the HMA into 2 time frames is to cut down on the number of hunters out there at one time. Thats a good thing, I'd rather not be out there with 400 people. I think everyone has a much better experience when the pressure is spread out...I dont know about you, but I'd rather not hunt with a crowd.
The reasons for the way those HMA's your talking about are managed is not just to piss you off...if makes good sense for lots of reasons.
BTW, just because your permit is good for a certain time frame, sure doesnt mean you can hunt someones private land during that entire time frame.
I'd be real careful about bitching to the G&F about the HMA's because you feel like you should be able to hunt both areas and whenever you feel like it. For the record, one of the HMA's you're talking about was just about pulled out of the program when it was a walk-in area...too many people and people shooting toward each other, etc. That was one of the catalysts to start limiting how many hunters were allowed out there at a time.
The WYG&F doesnt do a lot of things right, but in this case, I believe the AccessYes program is one of the things they really do a good job with. They've made the rules for a reason.