JoseCuervo
New member
Rubio is a bit more nuanced and not as "in your face" as Cruz is with selling My Public Lands, let's not forget that Rubio is just as committed to selling My Public Lands as Cruz and the rest of the GOP.
Rubio's Interview with DesMoines Register
If you don't want to click on the video, here is the quote:
Yes, "legitimate need for defense purposes" is a dog-whistle to the nut case "constitutional conservatives" that want to end hunting in the West.
And, if you care to actually go to his website and read his "Energy Policy", you can see his first promise:
More from his website:
Which, Rubio's positions directly line up with the GOP platform.
Linky-link to the GOP.com platform
Rubio's Interview with DesMoines Register
If you don't want to click on the video, here is the quote:
“I most certainly believe that the federal government controls far too much land in the Western parts of the United States especially,” Rubio told the Des Moines Register’s editorial board. “The state of Nevada is an example — it’s almost entirely owned by the federal government. And it goes well beyond the legitimate need of land ownership for defense purposes, for example.”
Yes, "legitimate need for defense purposes" is a dog-whistle to the nut case "constitutional conservatives" that want to end hunting in the West.
And, if you care to actually go to his website and read his "Energy Policy", you can see his first promise:
Linky-Link to Rubio's WebsiteEmpower States and Tribes to Control Onshore Energy Development Within Their Borders
More from his website:
Making the best use of America’s energy resources provides abundant opportunities for high-paying jobs, many of which don’t even require a college degree. Marco will allow states to oversee energy production on federal lands, cut back on job-killing EPA regulations, and more
Which, Rubio's positions directly line up with the GOP platform.
Experience has shown that, in caring for the land and water, private ownership has been our best guarantee of conscientious stewardship, while the worst instances of environmental degradation have occurred under government control. By the same token, the most economically advanced countries – those that respect and protect private property rights – also have the strongest environmental protections, because their economic progress makes possible the conservation of natural resources. In this context, Congress should reconsider whether parts of the federal government’s enormous landholdings and control of water in the West could be better used for ranching, mining, or forestry through private ownership. Timber is a renewable natural resource, which provides jobs to thousands of Americans. All efforts should be made to make federal lands managed by the U.S. Forest Service available for harvesting. The enduring truth is that people best protect what they own.
Linky-link to the GOP.com platform