Nice flamer guys!
I'm gonna like it here.
First let me say I read what's happening in this thread before the other one, on purpose... one stinky kettle of fish at a time.
Ithaca 37,
As a long time (30+yrs) ORV enthusiast and racer, and a hunter very concerned for quail in particular, I'd like to say that I personally take no offense by what you are saying here.
I have seen the damages you portend by ATV use, regardless of which portion of the motorized wheeled vehicles have done it (ie. four wheel drive trucks, quads, dirt bikes), and I think you've been kind to not include the non-motorized wheeled vehicles (mtnbikers, and the latest off trail ridden rage the dirtboard).
(Dirtboarders look to be hugely obvious candidates for Darwin Awards, with some notable accidents already, without snow the forest floor can be a very unfriendly place to land.)
In all of my years of riding much of it was spent on BLM and DNR lands, and much of it open rangeland.
To me it is an indisputable fact that ranching has taken a toll on much of the West. And that indigenous wildlife pay that toll on a daily basis, that's without taking into account competion from introduced species, game, ferel and accidental.
But this is not to say I am anymore anti-hunter, than Ithaca 37 is, which I believe he is not.
I haven't been here very long so maybe my opinion is good here... I have no friends, so I can be totally objective.
That's not to say my point of view is right, but at least I'm not one of "a crowd"... yet... (I'm sure some kinda label will come from this post, but if you can't take the heat stay outta the kitchen eh?).
I have seen a drastic reduction of indigenous quail populations in my lifetime, this is a big part of why I now hunt predators.
And as far as hunting season extentions, and protected and non-protected species alongside in the field, there are many examples of this kind of thing. Where hunters must positively identify game species (or sexes) that may be very difficult to tell apart, before they can shoot it. All part of the game.
If a realistic view of the state of the environment, and doing something about it, means one has a "green agenda"... so be it. That, to me, would be no insult.
Intelligent visionaries like you are going to preserve hunting!
Sometimes pieces of the truth can be found on another side of an issue, so referencing opposing groups websites, or points of view, only broadens one's view of the whole truth. As long as you're willing to look for it.
If we want continue to use the land, we gotta stop abusing it, it can only hold out so long.
Because the truth of the matter is there will always be sport hunting, and a fur industry... between the two, generating over $56 billion a year in revenues and over 200,000 jobs (in PA alone!
just kidding) nationwide.
"Keep on keepin' on" can't work forever?!?
This looks a lot to me, the new guy, like a gang attack on "the smart kid"... at least that's what I'd of thought if I'd seen this the first week at a new school... it's easy for the inferior to feel like the superior has a complex about it.
I-37, I am not afraid of you, as I am sure you are not of me... and one of us has
got to be smarter than the other one. lol
And the computer, and written text in general, is so difficult to interpret the intent of the writer. Without voice inflection and body language things get easily misunderstood, battlelines become drawn, and being the most competitive of male hunter/gatherer primates, we cannot back away from the foe on the other side of that line...
It is something I have found even more prevalent in hunters than any other group of "hobbyists" I've spent time in BBs with... go figure???
Though militant climberchics can get really, really aggro!
Jeff
<FONT COLOR="#800080" SIZE="1">[ 02-16-2003 04:57: Message edited by: Krustyklimber ]</font>