It's not about who to blame. To
@TOGIE question, I will change my answer to 'Yes, if builders built more houses it would solve the problem". But they haven't for years so I'm not holding my breath on that. I don't blame builders. As you know, they do what is economically in their best interest - Capitalism is great. I also don't like blaming the Fed. The Fed has 2 tools- the cost of money and the amount of money. If we rail on the Fed then the next politician will tell us they will solve the problem with one of those two tools. In the end that just makes us more reliant on the Fed/Government to fix our problems rather than less as many think.
I grew up in a 1600sq ft house built in the 60's. Six of us.
My first home purchase was a 900sq ft condo with a mortgage of 7.5%
The next house was 1800 sq ft build in post WWII boom.
So maybe we should ask if builders are building the right homes. Do we build this size home any more, ie. starter homes? If not, why? Are our expectations on housing size and location realistic? How do we "fix" any of this?
The post WWII housing boom was probably driven by some lending rules in the GI bill that let returning soldiers easily borrow and buy homes. Creations like the 30yr mtg and tax incentives furthered the "boom" for decades. Now we have a situation where only those with a sizable amount of cash can buy a home. Seems f-ed up. But these are problems of our own creation, so I have some hope we can figure them out.