Are WY antelope tag allocations not well under what they were 6-7 years ago before some significant die-off events? I'm not sure this is a pivot, seems more like natural flux on the whole to me. This is a Buzz type of question.
Lopehunter is not correct and its a shame that this type of rhetoric is allowed to even be posted. Hardly worth even responding to really, his conjecture just doesn't line up with reality. This is the exact reason why I'm actively involved in wildlife issues in Wyoming and why I talk to biologists all across the State routinely.
I attended the general meeting in Baggs, Wyoming last night...6 hours of driving for 2 hours of meeting, but well worth getting home near midnight.
As others have pointed out, the increases in quotas are very modest, but are in direct response to population increases following 2 mild winters in a row in large portions of the State. Every pronghorn herd unit in the Baggs area is right at population objectives or slightly over. Deer are the same way, and as per always, elk are doing very good.
I also talked again today with the area biologist, as well as another serious hunter from Baggs and who was also at the meeting last night (Greenhorn knows who I'm talking about). Their conclusion, and these guys would know, is that the bump in tag numbers is needed to keep the populations right at objective as the over-all range conditions are not as good as they've been in the past. This would also confirm what I'm seeing on the ground when I'm working/hunting the same area. There is only so many groceries out there for the wildlife, while its not dire by any means, its just that where the populations are currently at, combined with range conditions...the quotas make total biological sense.
That's all I'm ever looking for, and the area Biologist is spot on. What they try to do is find that sweet spot where they avoid the huge population swings and the high peaks and low valleys that often occur in populations. IMO/E the Biologists here are very pro-active in management and provide the data to support their recommendations. Rarely do quotas go unchanged from year to year, fluctuating both up and down depending on what the data shows.
Its unrealistic to ask for more than that.
Also, if anyone believes that I would be a person to "salute the FG flag" as lopehunter said, if I truly believe these modest increases weren't warranted...you'd be dead wrong. I'd be the first to call BS, and so would a lot of others that are involved.
For the record, on the drive over, I saw a lot of pronghorn and horn growth looks pretty darn impressive...