I'm a drywaller. We have horrible reputations, and frankly deserve every bit of it
Like I said days ago. ONLY a lawyer can look the difference between treaty Wyoming territory, and 2019 National Forest, and pretend them the same.
Only a lawyer can pretend the CROW didn't sign this knowing full well they did so to save extinction. Kniwing full well that that the land was on its way to being occupied.
The ONLY REASON it was not homesteads. Not ranches, is because the federal government created Forest Land. This was NOT created by Wyoming.
This is just another example of the Federal Government overreach. It locked up millions of acres that were on the way to being occupied or were occupied, then 100 years later says "look, no one is there".
I keep hearing the lawyers saying "you can't consider context". Of course you can, and should. The state of Wyoming didn't create this issue, the Federal Government did. The CROW should be able to hunt every animal the federal government has jurisdiction over.
This is why non lawyers listen to Mike Lee and despite knowing he us a weasel, agree with his claim of federal overreach.
The crow signed a treaty with the word OCCUPIED. It does not say ANY LAND.
Occupied was put there for a reason. Only lawyers can pretend otherwise. Only lawyers want to group dozens of sovereign nations who signed separate treaties with distinct wording as the same.
This is 100% the Federal government dictating to a state, Wildlife policy which the Federal government has no say in.
For non lawyers, this is another example of federal overreach and judicial tyranny.
Like I said days ago. ONLY a lawyer can look the difference between treaty Wyoming territory, and 2019 National Forest, and pretend them the same.
Only a lawyer can pretend the CROW didn't sign this knowing full well they did so to save extinction. Kniwing full well that that the land was on its way to being occupied.
The ONLY REASON it was not homesteads. Not ranches, is because the federal government created Forest Land. This was NOT created by Wyoming.
This is just another example of the Federal Government overreach. It locked up millions of acres that were on the way to being occupied or were occupied, then 100 years later says "look, no one is there".
I keep hearing the lawyers saying "you can't consider context". Of course you can, and should. The state of Wyoming didn't create this issue, the Federal Government did. The CROW should be able to hunt every animal the federal government has jurisdiction over.
This is why non lawyers listen to Mike Lee and despite knowing he us a weasel, agree with his claim of federal overreach.
The crow signed a treaty with the word OCCUPIED. It does not say ANY LAND.
Occupied was put there for a reason. Only lawyers can pretend otherwise. Only lawyers want to group dozens of sovereign nations who signed separate treaties with distinct wording as the same.
This is 100% the Federal government dictating to a state, Wildlife policy which the Federal government has no say in.
For non lawyers, this is another example of federal overreach and judicial tyranny.