But hunters can make a conscious choice not to hunt during a shoulder season. I wonder how many that voice opposition actually make that choice.
I have never hunted the shoulder seasons, though I have hunted game damage hunts, and see a distinct difference between the two. One is a wholesale reduction of elk numbers across an entire HD, the other is an acute attempt at resolving an acute problem. I support the latter, and hope such a model, and maybe even a more aggressive one, is part of a
successful way to move forward that acknowledges the financial suffering elk can cause a landowner, that doesn't throw the baby out with the bathwater in the way shoulder seasons do.
Whether some hunters partake, I can kind of charitably look at it like speed limits. I think speed limits should be slower, but you will catch me driving 80 every now and then. The same for hunters could be true. All else being equal, a hunter who when thinking soberly about shoulder seasons in July would oppose them, may, in the frustration of an unsuccessful season and desperation that elk brings out in hunters, drive toward White Sulphur Springs with a loaded gun the week of Christmas.
Not apologizing for anyone. Folks should not participate. But I believe when framed correctly, most Montanans oppose Shoulder Seasons. Questions that can help frame things:
-Is it reasonable to hunt elk 6 months out of the year?
-Are there so many elk out there that you find elk hunting easy?
-When you go hunting every November do you tell yourself, "Man, there are just 60,000 too many elk in Montana."
-What do you think is going on when some landowners bellyache about elk out of one side of their mouth and then name the price for someone to come on their land and shoot them out of the other?
-Has public land hunting gotten better or worse for you over the last decade since shoulder seasons were implemented?