It might work for a commuter fleet, but how much does towing or a full bed drag down that already low range?
There are a bunch of quotes from the CEO on that article that give me pause, like how there isn't an engine that breaks down and requires maintenance. No, there are 4 motors instead, a slew of expensive batteries that will need to be replaced (probably right at the time the fleet goes to the pre-owned market, killing resale), software quirks and issues with updates (anyone in the technology world is familiar with "Patch Tuesday"), not to mention this is a first time automaker, with their first model, and the first owners will be real world beta testers. I know this argument is similar to what was probably used when Tesla entered the market, but that was a LOT of money dumped in to get them going and set up a charging infrastructure. I'm still not sold on Tesla.
E-vehicles are making constant advancements, and if battery technology evolves enough to give these vehicles serious range in a small footprint (even better if the materials aren't rare or toxic) then we may see it overtake IC engines. The instantly available max torque is a nice benefit.
I'd be apprehensive about buying from this company. You'll have to hope they aren't knockers up in a couple years when Tesla and the big 3 come into the market. GM loaning the startup money to them might help them last, maybe they have plans to buy the company or have terms that lets them absorb the company should they default.