Thanks for the response.
Pendley to be nominated to head BLM
- Thread starter Oak
- Start date
Irishman
Well-known member
Can't speak for O&G or mineral, but I can address the notion that the pendulum has swung too far on timber extraction. I worked for Plumcreek for 27 years, and managed sawmills for about half that time. The real truth about why timber extraction has been limited on public land is that they were overcutting it for decades. The much bigger problem was that the timber companies, Plumcreek being the largest in the US, harvested their own land as fast as they could. It's all about corporate greed, making as much money today as possible, and no thoughts about the future. Plumcreek used to have 6 sawmills and 2 plywood plants in the region, but they ran as many crews as possible, so they could covert their logs to cash as quickly as possible, then ran out of logs and shut down most of their mills. They did not care at all about all the people who worked for them that they left unemployed.
So when Plumcreek got through raping the forest, they weren't going to wait 50 years for the trees to grow back (remember they wanted cash tomorrow, not in 50 years), so they made deals with TNC for land that Plumcreek had no use for.
Since the Plumcreek/Weyerhaeuser land is usually in a checkerboard pattern mixed with national forest land, it's a good thing that the National forest cut back on harvest, otherwise we would have huge areas with nothing but tiny trees and no cover for wildlife. So in effect the the big timber companies kind of tied the forest service's hands on timber harvest, then when they chewed through their own logs they complained about the forest service harvest levels. I figure it's kind of like going on a week long camping trip with another person, and you both brought along the same amount of food, but the other guy ate all his food the first day and spent the rest of the week complaining to you about not sharing your food with him.
Last edited by a moderator:
@Irishman , I respect your comment.
Instead of hashing this subject again, here's a recent thread that shared various HT member opinions on the subject you shared.
Not saying your content is off topic, rather, instead of rehashing recent responses to your more, in-depth opinion, I can see this thread regarding Pendley's nomination turn into another timber specific thread.
My comment was a simple response to Trail's open Q about what Pendley, "might" offer. - Cheers.
www.hunttalk.com
Instead of hashing this subject again, here's a recent thread that shared various HT member opinions on the subject you shared.
Not saying your content is off topic, rather, instead of rehashing recent responses to your more, in-depth opinion, I can see this thread regarding Pendley's nomination turn into another timber specific thread.
My comment was a simple response to Trail's open Q about what Pendley, "might" offer. - Cheers.
U.S. Vision: Development Within National Forests.
Reuters: https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN23J350 I support forestry and mining of our public lands. Far too long Counties across America, such as Lincoln and Sanders Counties in NW MT have been economically hamstrung by environmental organizations. If managed prudently, timber...
www.hunttalk.com
BuzzH
Well-known member
Even bringing up timber resource in a thread about Pendley and the BLM is laughable.
Not that there isn't a tiny bit of timber value on BLM land, but its largely insignificant on a vast, vast majority of BLM lands across the interior west.
There isn't enough volume in most states to support even a single mom and pop sawmill off the timber assets found on BLM land.
Also, I agree with Irishman, that is exactly what happened, private industry took the get rich quick, rape and run mentality to its timber. Completely within their rights to liquidate timber assets for short term profit...and in fairness they never hid that fact. The employee's of the mills were told to not expect a job long-term, I remember having that discussion with my Dad who worked at Bonner for the last 10 years it existed. In fact, the mill actually ran a few more years than projected. Dad stayed and worked an extra year or so longer than he needed to for retirement, because it became apparent to everyone with a firing brain cell or two, that the mill wouldn't last long. His gamble was to stay on and collect a severance package if offered rather than retire. In other words, do the exact same thing any good corporation would do, milk every last penny out of the company, including the severance package.
That said, what a lot of the employee's wanted to hear was that the ASQ's on NF lands would increase enough to save the mills...wasn't about to happen, everyone knew it except those wearing rose colored glasses.
The fact is, trees grow too slowly in Montana to sustain the accelerated harvest that went on in the 80's-early 2000's...just the way it is.
Not that there isn't a tiny bit of timber value on BLM land, but its largely insignificant on a vast, vast majority of BLM lands across the interior west.
There isn't enough volume in most states to support even a single mom and pop sawmill off the timber assets found on BLM land.
Also, I agree with Irishman, that is exactly what happened, private industry took the get rich quick, rape and run mentality to its timber. Completely within their rights to liquidate timber assets for short term profit...and in fairness they never hid that fact. The employee's of the mills were told to not expect a job long-term, I remember having that discussion with my Dad who worked at Bonner for the last 10 years it existed. In fact, the mill actually ran a few more years than projected. Dad stayed and worked an extra year or so longer than he needed to for retirement, because it became apparent to everyone with a firing brain cell or two, that the mill wouldn't last long. His gamble was to stay on and collect a severance package if offered rather than retire. In other words, do the exact same thing any good corporation would do, milk every last penny out of the company, including the severance package.
That said, what a lot of the employee's wanted to hear was that the ASQ's on NF lands would increase enough to save the mills...wasn't about to happen, everyone knew it except those wearing rose colored glasses.
The fact is, trees grow too slowly in Montana to sustain the accelerated harvest that went on in the 80's-early 2000's...just the way it is.
Irishman
Well-known member
Thanks, I hadn't read the other thread.@Irishman , I respect your comment.
Instead of hashing this subject again, here's a recent thread that shared various HT member opinions on the subject you shared.
Not saying your content is off topic, rather, instead of rehashing recent responses to your more, in-depth opinion, I can see this thread regarding Pendley's nomination turn into another timber specific thread.
My comment was a simple response to Trail's open Q about what Pendley, "might" offer. - Cheers.
U.S. Vision: Development Within National Forests.
Reuters: https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN23J350 I support forestry and mining of our public lands. Far too long Counties across America, such as Lincoln and Sanders Counties in NW MT have been economically hamstrung by environmental organizations. If managed prudently, timber...
Irrelevant
Well-known member
Why A Vote For Trump's Lands Appointee May Put Some Western Republicans In A Bind
Republican senators facing tough reelections may be in the hot seat when it comes time to vote on President Trump's controversial nominee to head the nation's largest public lands agency.
www.npr.org
Similar threads
