Re-read my post: "regardless of what many politicians say when they are campaigning, when they get back to Washington, they vote their party line." Me not knowing any of the GOP House candidates, I was hoping someone would know if any candidate was more land, wildlife, and gun friendly than the others.
Not all mineral, oil, and gas production on public land is necessarily bad:
The area in western Colorado where I shot my Mountain Lion was heavily explored for uranium years ago. Today there is little evidence of that exploration other than some open roads and some grown-in wheel track type roads.
The unit that I hunted antelope in the Red Desert area of Wyoming had more large bucks than any unit in Montana that I have ever hunted. Access in that unit was available from many oil production roads to many working wells.
One area in SE Montana that I've hunted antelope in for a half dozen or more years, had a big crew putting in a 30" diameter oil pipeline one year. When I went back there a couple of years later, the pipeline was buried, the ground re-contoured and seeded, and if I hadn't seen them putting it in, I wouldn't have known it was there.
And the list goes on...