sneakypete
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 19, 2014
- Messages
- 1,980
Randy, what an epic adventure and hunt to the great north. The pictures bring back great memories of a couple of hunts to the Stone Mountain area in northern BC! Thank you for sharing!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The outfitter measures every animal they take and he keeps meticulous records.@Big Fin you said said Andy's was 1/2" longer and 1/4" bigger around. What were the specs on yours? Both are super rams, and I think I may be underestimating them, pictures are hard to judge. Looking forward to the video of this one.
What a great adventure, thanks for writing that up and sharing.
Both are amazing sheep, thanks for sharing the stats. Did you get them measured and sealed? Curious to know what the bios say compared to the outfitter. They pulled a tooth on mine as well, but the margin of error on teeth and judging rings is the same at 1yr. Its so hard to guess them from pics. I thought both were 38-40, and right near 14 on the bases. To be honest when they are B&C it really doesn't matter that much if they are a touch bigger or not. I still can't believe Andy passed on your ram. I can't imagine anyone passing on that one. When they get that big it really doesn't matter IMO.The outfitter measures every animal they take and he keeps meticulous records.
They had my ram at 38 3/4. One guy had it at 39, but he's not the "official" for that camp. They tried to get mine to 14" of mass, but he was just short. They put it at 13 3/4. For score they had mine at 160 1/2" gross.
Andy's was 39 1/4" and 14 1/4". The way his ram dropped down lower was deceiving to me. That ram carried its mass out further than most, which I think disguised its length. For score they had Andy's at 165" gross.
The caribou they came up with 397", not counting 11" on the second shovel. The official guy who keeps the scores wasn't sure if the height of the second shovel counted, so he stuck with 397. Which with velvet, is probably 8-10" that wouldn't be there if he was hard horned.
I pulled teeth on all of them and I will be dropping them off at Matson's this week. Will be interesting to age them and compare to the rings. The rings were so tight at the bases they were conservatively estimating both rams at 9+. The caribou only had one salvageable tooth, so who knows what age he will be.
8 to 10 inches might be a bit much. It is my experience that you will loose on every circumference measurement, but will often stay the same or even increase on tine length dew to lower base lines.The outfitter measures every animal they take and he keeps meticulous records.
The caribou they came up with 397", not counting 11" on the second shovel. The official guy who keeps the scores wasn't sure if the height of the second shovel counted, so he stuck with 397. Which with velvet, is probably 8-10" that wouldn't be there if he was hard horned.