I saw my first Sage Grouse in person last year when hunting a new to me unit - those birds are stunning. I stopped and watched them for 10-20 minutes almost every time I saw them. Believe it or not, people love their wildlife and want to protect their wildlife. One of the standard tools to achieve protection has been the ESA, which it more punitive in nature, and can be bundled into agendas unfortunately. Ideally, a less punitive model would exist for conserving species but lets be honest, Americans have a tough time facing reality, not maximizing profits, and voluntarily making sacrifices that are not in their best interest. The ESA hails from a time when both republicans and democrats shared concern over the environment. In fact, the house vote on the ESA bill was
390-12, the senate vote was
92-0. Ask yourself a couple questions here. Is there a bipartisan alternative to the ESA in todays United States? How did we arrive at this moment - a once bipartisan environmental movement that is now widely unpopular in the GOP?
The primary agenda here is conservation, people would be devastated if this bird disappeared.
Outlining steep losses and a gloomy future for the bird without action, a new government report aims to stem further declines with an advanced monitoring program.
www.audubon.org
"The number of sage-grouse has plummeted by 80 percent since 1965 across the charismatic bird’s 11-state western range, according to a report published today by the U.S. Geological Survey, the science agency for the Department of the Interior. Half of that decline has happened just since 2002."