So, my question is, does OYOA turn into another "best of the west" where game is no longer stalked, hunting skills are no longer important, and all animals are plugged at 500-1200+ yards in an attempt to satisfy the custom rifle sponsorship and the viewers need for one???.
Oh yeah, just wait and see. I was thinking that our goal of everything under 200 yards is what is going to be the downfall of our show, so now, it must be 600+ before we consider it. If we are too close, we will drop back to artillery range.
Not to worry. As most have seen, our footage is pretty "up close" and personal.
I guess I never thought of custom rifles as just being long range bombers. I always think of them as durable, reliable, and usually lighter in weight and hopefully a little more accurate if the operator can perform. And given how poorly I usually perform, any "long rangers" probably best stay away from our show, as the rifle's image is only as good as my shaky hands.
I never have been interested in long range shooting at animals. Kind of fun at the range, but too risky in the field, and not why I hunt.
Oak will testify that if I was into long range shooting you would see a 2010 episode where a net B&C antelope bites the dust at 350 yards. Just not our style. And, the footage at long distances sucks, plain and simple. And for our show, I want good footage.
Yeah, sometimes we do take a longer shot, but we don't make that the premise of our hunting. Much prefer those 120 yard shots where you can see the animal blink just before he runs off. If it is a longer shot, it is because we didn't feel we could get the cameras/hunter any closer.
Each show has a different idea of what will be their "Schtick." Some by selling long range shooting, others by selling anything that someone will pay them to talk about, others that think we are dumb enough to believe that "I wouldn't have killed that buck with my XYZ doodad," etc.
The beauty of our show is that we promote a concept, not personalities, not a specific device we are trying to sell, but hunting as most of us do it. And regardless of what product we are using, the product integration is way more natural and delivered at a higher level than any other show out there. Sounds boastful, but there is a reason we don't have to pimp out the products we use. People see them being used, "in the heat of battle" and know that they work.
I am thankful that I don't feel compelled to insult the intelligence of our viewers by standing there and proclaiming that my Buck Bag Seer Salt is what allowed me to kill Gomer. If it gets to that point, I will pack up the tent and call it good.
When it comes down to it, we probably know I could go downstairs, grab my Grandpa's old .30 Remington, a handful of Kleanbore ammo, and kill a buck within 100 yards using those open sights. And I would be able to see him at that distance no matter what I used for optics, and could probably get him out of the woods without a pack and if pressed, could gut and gill him with my multi-tool, But, we strive to use equipment that gives us more confidence/comfort, with confidence/comfort being a good part of what helps me know I will be able to close the deal when the time calls.
To me, it is about using equipment that can do the job we ask of it. The better the value equation, the more I like it. And after that, it is who recognizes the value of promoting non-guided hunting as an important part to the future of hunting and wants to be associated with the concept.
I am probably over-thinking this, but value you all your opinions. Keep them coming.
We are also talking to some well known "off the shelf" firearm brands. But, in many instances, "off the shelf" brands demand the most "in show promo" and that is part of why some of them are not in this show.
And if I end up not signing a rifle sponsor, life will go on. We will still kill critters, even if we have to get within 200 yards to do so.