beagle001
Well-known member
Hey folks,
Didn't want to take away from the other thread about appreciating good hunting partners, but I've got a question regarding the ethics of hunting public land. This topic was brought up a while back on the Full Draw Full Time podcast, but it's become more relevant to me lately.
So, the topic at hand is "your spots" on public land. Obviously, it's public land, so it's everyone's, but when does a spot become "your spot?"
Direction/background on topic...
My best friend (BFF) and I (referred to as "We" most often) always dreamed about going on out-of-state hunts, whether whitetail or other big game. Finally, 4 year ago we were asked to go on a hunt with two other buddies (one being Friend A). Initial plans were to go to Kentucky, but the hurricane rolled through that week, so on a whim, we went to North Dakota. Had a fun hunt, though a mediocre area, but that was enough to light the fire.
The next year, BFF and I planned a hunt to South Dakota, and we had two buddies (one being Friend B) we wanted to bring, but due to unforeseen circumstances, Friend B couldn't go, so we asked "A" to join. We had a blast, and fell in love with South Dakota.
Enter Friend C, who has a bit of a jealous bone, tends to think outloud, and always wants to be included, but is usually best handled in small doses. Good guy, but hard to handle sometimes.
Anyway, "C" calls me and BFF before Christmas and wants to start planning a hunt already for next year. We oblige and make plans to go to Kansas during the rut. Friend C also invites his best friend to be part of this excursion. Well, fast forward a few months, we ran into some road blocks with where we were going to hunt Kansas, so we began looking for backup plans. Lots of ideas came up, but BFF and my yearning to get back to SD, won out over best judgment, and we settled on taking Friend C and his friend to the same place we hunted the year before.
Had a good hunt, but spending a week with C plus-1 was... less than ideal.
Went back last year, just the two of us (much more relaxing) and we should draw rifle tags this year, along with Friend A.
Since then, C always wants to go with us, no matter what we have planned, and automatically thinks he is "in."
BFF and I have decided that we only want Friend B to go back there with us, since he was supposed to be with the first year, and Friend A, because he is great to travel with, and he took us to his spot in ND way back.
My question (sorry long winded, and slightly too much like Young and the Restless), is one year of going to a place enough to make it "your spot?" Does Friend C have any stake in that claim since he was with on year two, and we weren't supposed to hunt there to begin with? Should we feel obligated to include him in future hunts? Where does everyone stand on these issues?I think if C-plus-1 (the same 1) wanted to go back on their own, I would be ok with it, as long as they keep their mouth shut.
Didn't want to take away from the other thread about appreciating good hunting partners, but I've got a question regarding the ethics of hunting public land. This topic was brought up a while back on the Full Draw Full Time podcast, but it's become more relevant to me lately.
So, the topic at hand is "your spots" on public land. Obviously, it's public land, so it's everyone's, but when does a spot become "your spot?"
Direction/background on topic...
My best friend (BFF) and I (referred to as "We" most often) always dreamed about going on out-of-state hunts, whether whitetail or other big game. Finally, 4 year ago we were asked to go on a hunt with two other buddies (one being Friend A). Initial plans were to go to Kentucky, but the hurricane rolled through that week, so on a whim, we went to North Dakota. Had a fun hunt, though a mediocre area, but that was enough to light the fire.
The next year, BFF and I planned a hunt to South Dakota, and we had two buddies (one being Friend B) we wanted to bring, but due to unforeseen circumstances, Friend B couldn't go, so we asked "A" to join. We had a blast, and fell in love with South Dakota.
Enter Friend C, who has a bit of a jealous bone, tends to think outloud, and always wants to be included, but is usually best handled in small doses. Good guy, but hard to handle sometimes.
Anyway, "C" calls me and BFF before Christmas and wants to start planning a hunt already for next year. We oblige and make plans to go to Kansas during the rut. Friend C also invites his best friend to be part of this excursion. Well, fast forward a few months, we ran into some road blocks with where we were going to hunt Kansas, so we began looking for backup plans. Lots of ideas came up, but BFF and my yearning to get back to SD, won out over best judgment, and we settled on taking Friend C and his friend to the same place we hunted the year before.
Had a good hunt, but spending a week with C plus-1 was... less than ideal.
Went back last year, just the two of us (much more relaxing) and we should draw rifle tags this year, along with Friend A.
Since then, C always wants to go with us, no matter what we have planned, and automatically thinks he is "in."
BFF and I have decided that we only want Friend B to go back there with us, since he was supposed to be with the first year, and Friend A, because he is great to travel with, and he took us to his spot in ND way back.
My question (sorry long winded, and slightly too much like Young and the Restless), is one year of going to a place enough to make it "your spot?" Does Friend C have any stake in that claim since he was with on year two, and we weren't supposed to hunt there to begin with? Should we feel obligated to include him in future hunts? Where does everyone stand on these issues?I think if C-plus-1 (the same 1) wanted to go back on their own, I would be ok with it, as long as they keep their mouth shut.