New rules for pa.

You are making my point for me. The public has no claim to personal property. They do for fish and wildlife.
No, I am not. You don't make any point. The owner of the property (whether private chattel or public property-wildlife here) that LE may be concerned with makes NO difference. Fish and wildlife are NOT some magical class of property that should preempt constitutional rights. Every space in America, including YOUR dwelling, COULD have/house/conceal some sort of wildlife that the public has a "claim" to as you say. So what? You either have probable cause and retrieve a warrant or you do not and you stay out.
 

The PA constitution Article 1 Section 8 provides residents of the Commonwealth greater freedoms from unreasonable searches than the US Constitution 4th Amendment.
 
When you have large ranch tracts and officers have to witness any wrong doings, how can they get that accomplished without the ability to enter the land to watch. In SD we have had large ranches start issuing ranch tags as I believe they thought that the game animals were theirs to do what they wished with. The great Gov. Noem killed the open fields approach. She was a commercial operator and a landowner so maybe she had some personal interest in this.
 
Idaho also lost the open fields doctrine recently, I was disappointed. It's pretty easy for a landowner to poach and have an animal in a freezer before a warrant is issued. So what's the solution if not the open fields doctrine, how else do you protect a public resource on private property?

Also 100% of the people that litigate against the open fields doctrine were caught violating game laws. I'm not going to side with a poacher even if their argument might have merit. It's like "yes I was breaking the law but you shouldn't have been able to catch me doing it". What a scumbag perspective.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
119,785
Messages
2,238,391
Members
39,008
Latest member
RogersTaxi
Back
Top