It's not only your first appointment. The only time you wouldn't go on probation is if you lateral (same pay position) and maybe a few other exceptions based on different hiring authorities. Any promotions or change in agency would require a probationary period.
Link? I would be interested and more than willing to stand corrected. I am a Union representative within one of the largest Federal Unions and deal with this on occasion for transfers.
There is no probationary period for details (temp promotions to supervisor or some higher-grade role).
Said it earlier, this is exactly what just happened in West Virginia. The new governor and the old one were both republicans. New one is bashing the old one for claiming things that were not true and leaving the state with a looming deficit.
Reagan's sagebrush rebelllion.
Honest question, have you ever found inconsistency between OPM/HR/Agency? I know I certainly have.
You get rid of all the subscriptions and Congress might actually have to read a bill before voting on it.
Inconsistencies, yes, hence grievance procedure - in the end, OPM is the final authority over Agency HR unless it's an ambiguous - differed to the Agency for policy. MOUs are not binding if they oppose OPM, unless again, the OPM differs it to the Agency. Our agency holds NTE's and probation employees are typically not permitted through for NTE positions. NTE are typically journeymen who are moved to another location "Not To Exceed" x time frame and returned to their defined duty station. NTE are not a probationary detail or... if for some reason they permit an employee currently on probation to accept the position - then they are required to complete their probation time frame.
Copy that, thank you.
The RMP amendment is part of a lawsuit settlement with the State of Colorado and other litigants.
Won't make a difference. They only need their stock broker to read it, so they know what side to game.
www.hcn.org
Exactly. I can say that the mental gymnastics that they need to go through to make a tax extension deficit neutral is mind boggling. The biggest problem is cutting $1T in government spending cuts about 0.5-1.0% off GDP, which makes the numbers worse. They could maybe say that lower growth means lower interest rates so that expense falls. But that isn't a great political narrative. Somehow they will blame Biden or some new boogieman. Obviously the lack of these funds is going to hurt a lot of smaller communities. I have complete confidence they will find a way to sell it to the public though, and it will be bought hand over fist.
So you're good w the propaganda version, not interested in the realities within these agencies? Posts from current federal employees are the only truth in this Deutchland Uber Alles trumpian liarpalooza.
