LO Battle Ahead?

Every once in a while, some folks need to stick their finger in a socket to remind themselves that electricity ain't seen, but it sure as #*^@#* can be felt.

The committee is about to get shocked. I'm confident the hunters and anglers of Wyoming have this threat well in hand. Good hunting, @BuzzH & all you Cowboy staters.
 
Every once in a while, some folks need to stick their finger in a socket to remind themselves that electricity ain't seen, but it sure as #*^@#* can be felt.

The committee is about to get shocked. I'm confident the hunters and anglers of Wyoming have this threat well in hand. Good hunting, @BuzzH & all you Cowboy staters.
I volunteer treecarp to test the socket.
 
Sweet- so let’s just call it a net neutral to residents financially with the upside of higher animal tolerance and increased land access.

What is the downside?

Those two points are speculative at best. And most likely overly optimistic.

Based on what I have seen called a compromise in the past, I would rather just not negociate on this one.
 
Can I infer from the ad hominem attacks that you guys are out of valid counter-arguments?
I mean - if youre the biggest advocate on a forum for a given system - but you choose not to participate in it... seems to hurt the credibility of your argument
 
I mean - if youre the biggest advocate on a forum for a given system - but you choose not to participate in it... seems to hurt the credibility of your argument

Does that really make sense to you once you see that thought actually put into words in the screen?
 
Yeah, that would be weird right?

Struggling to see how my personal choice on this subject would impact anyone’s views on the program as a whole.
I'm similarly struggling to see why if you thought something was a smart economic choice, and benefitted the DIY hunter in general, you wouldn't take advantage of it. If you did, that's great.
 
I find it hard to fault @Treeshark for his view. Every state gladly screws NRs at every chance and the money/cost is slowly pushing out a lot of DIY hunters. He supports things that he thinks benefit him just like everyone else. The shark feels he can afford to pay the cost of a LO tag. If he can, I understand his view even more. He isn't alone in his view on LO tags, certainly from NRs, but most others aren't on this board. At the same time, it certainly distorts incentives and I can see why WY (and MT) hunters are against it. Looking at NM, the results show it isn't all bad. I hope it dies simply because everything in life shouldn't be about money. Once it is, we are all screwed.
 
He supports things that he thinks benefit him just like everyone else.

Perhaps they do, perhaps I could never dream of affording such a thing- that’s not relevant to the discussion we are having. My hope is to point out how everyone benefits from these programs if structured appropriately (like NM and Colorado LO programs are).

Residents, non-residents, non-hunting residents and most importantly the resource all benefit. Again I am left to wonder, what’s the downside (practically speaking)?
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
117,610
Messages
2,162,354
Members
38,286
Latest member
flatgo
Back
Top