El Jason
Well-known member
I have. But, it’s irrelevant. We’ve had plenty of discussion about resident hunters footing the entire bill and not having to deal with NR hunters.
Whatever. Same stuff, different day.
It’s not just corner hopping…
- Thread starter ODarrow
- Start date
Whatever. Same stuff, different day.
Elky Welky
Well-known member
Every bill comes with a fiscal note. Here's the legislative history:
Forkyfinder
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2023
- Messages
- 6,230
It’s always time
Interesting - i wish you luck at home dealing with the same issue. I get the sense thats where your spite comes from - you have the same thing at home except worse.
Nonresidents can’t carry Wisconsin’s license burden for us
What do Wisconsin hunters and anglers love to hate most: wolves, carp or nonresident competition?
Patrick Durkin: Nonresidents can’t carry Wisconsin’s license burden - Outdoor News
For nonresidents to pay 60% of Wisconsin’s gun-license revenues (roughly $11.58 million), they would have to pay about $337 each.
www.outdoornews.com
Last edited:
Schaaf
Well-known member
And you can access that parcel if a legal method exists outside of the BMA stipulation. That only states the parcel is inaccessible from the BMA.
It’s a shitty feature but it’s always been that way.
Gerald Martin
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2009
- Messages
- 9,725
I had a warden explain it to me that when you access a BMA and violate the BMA rules you are considered to be violating the terms of permission to access the property and will be prosecuted for trespassing.
This was when I asked him specifically about BMA’s that have property prohibitions against shooting game animals that are in season by FWP rule but the landowner prohibits take on his property (I.e, “no upland bird hunting, or no waterfowl, or no mule deer hunting) that are in the BMA rules.
He explained you would not be cited for taking game out of season because the FWP season was open.
Something else to keep in mind is that this year nearly all BMA’s are registered so that a conviction for violating FWP rules or law or terms of BMA permission carries a 1 year ban for accessing all registered BMA’s for a first conviction, a three year ban for a second conviction and a lifetime ban for a third conviction. Previously violations and bans were limited to being forbidden to access the BMA on which the violations occurred.
I would expect failure to sign in before hunting to be something that will be prosecuted more diligently in the future.
Email the county recorder and ask for any certificates of survey, or corner records for those sections. If nothing, you can get the GLO survey notes for the township from the BLM office in Billings.
I would assume that it has been surveyed. Either the state would’ve had a survey, or it would’ve surveyed after a private transaction at some point would be my guess.
sclancy27
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2022
- Messages
- 1,119
I'm interested how you define worse.....or if you actually read the article.Interesting - i wish you luck at home dealing with the same issue. I get the sense thats where your spite comes from - you have the same thing at home except worse.
Nonresidents can’t carry Wisconsin’s license burden for us
What do Wisconsin hunters and anglers love to hate most: wolves, carp or nonresident competition?www.wdtimes.com
Patrick Durkin: Nonresidents can’t carry Wisconsin’s license burden - Outdoor News
For nonresidents to pay 60% of Wisconsin’s gun-license revenues (roughly $11.58 million), they would have to pay about $337 each.
Elky Welky
Well-known member
Agreed Gerald. Just one thing different from what that warden told you, but they would more likely cite for hunting without permission.
