I don't think state land should be allowed to be enrolled in BM, but remember that state land is not public land.This is annoying me. Not sure how you can legally obtain access to public ground, but then not be allowed to use it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think state land should be allowed to be enrolled in BM, but remember that state land is not public land.This is annoying me. Not sure how you can legally obtain access to public ground, but then not be allowed to use it.
Something to remember when a politicians says they "support public land". The details are important....but remember that state land is not public land.
state land is not public land.
It's land owned by the state that the public is allowed to use. Recreational use of state land in MT wasn't allowed until the early 90's.Is state land not owned by the public in Montana?
Is state land not owned by the public in Montana?
It also technically requires a trespass fee, albeit insignificant.It's land owned by the state that the public is allowed to use. Recreational use of state land in MT wasn't allowed until the early 90's.
I'm pretty sure that first link there will explain it to you
F*ck those f*cking f*cks. This kind of stuff pisses me off. It is so intentional to keep out the public. I'm taking up pole-vaulting....I don’t mean to change the subject but there’s a very similar situation in the Judith River WMA. Mining company owns a strip literally only 8-10 yards wide making 1700 acres of Wildlife Management Area completely inaccessible. Used to be kind of a grey area, but the new FWP map has it specifically labeled as “inaccessible WMA”
Yes, they can. The permission granted for you to enter has stipulations attached. Violating the stipulations thereby renders the permission null and void and you are no longer lawfully there.To clarify, they can choose weather or not to allow you through their land to access a state section, but if they allow you on their land that is adjacent to a state parcel, they can't prohibit you from crossing the fence to state, can they?
Who could press charges? You could get a fine for breaking BMA rules, but it wouldn't be a trespass?Interesting.....
This cuts to the gist of it. State Land is by definition not public land. You can be excluded from hunting a state parcel of land enrolled in a BMA even if it’s legally accessible without signing into the BMA. You cannot be excluded from hunting a piece of BLM that is included in a BMA if it is otherwise legally accessible.I don't think state land should be allowed to be enrolled in BM, but remember that state land is not public land.
That is accurate.This cuts to the gist of it. State Land is by definition not public land. You can be excluded from hunting a state parcel of land enrolled in a BMA even if it’s legally accessible without signing into the BMA. You cannot be excluded from hunting a piece of BLM that is included in a BMA if it is otherwise legally accessible.
I’m generally okay with state land being enrolled in Block but on a case by case basis.
More likely time to think about shifting wasted money to long term access. But if that’s the way you want to take things I’m here for it.Is it time to shift the discussion to NR hunters and Montana mule deer seasons?