So, you asked the question, and I can tell you, you aren't going to like the answer...but you asked.
Lets get a couple things straight from the start.
1. Hunters don't have the market cornered on wanting wildlife to thrive, enjoying wildlife, etc.
2. Wildlife is held in trust for ALL citizens...
With that out of the way, I have ZERO problem with an antihunter putting in for a tag, drawing it, and pitching it the garbage...
That's why I don't care if a person draws a top quality tag and hunts it how they see fit...
Not every game animal on planet earth needs to be on someone's wall or end up as a turd floating in the local waste water treatment plant.
Lots of people value wildlife for a variety of reasons...
My 2 cents...
"So, you asked the question, and I can tell you, you aren't going to like the answer...but you asked."
I don't see a question in my post that you quoted, but you're right, I don't agree with your reply.
"Lets get a couple things straight from the start."
"1. Hunters don't have the market cornered on wanting wildlife to thrive, enjoying wildlife, etc."
No, they don't.
"2. Wildlife is held in trust for ALL citizens of the State its found in, with a couple/few exceptions waterfowl, Endangered Species, and anadromous fish (those are federally controlled but still collaboratively managed with the states)."
Yes, wildlife is held in trust for all citizens. There have also been abuses to the Endangered Species Act and with anadromous fish, but those are outside of this discussion.
"With that out of the way, I have ZERO problem with an antihunter putting in for a tag, drawing it, and pitching it the garbage, mounting it under glass, or lighting it on fire. They have as much right to apply as you, me, or anyone else. My thought would be that any anti that is passionate enough to learn the application process, front the money, purchase the tag, I have no ax to grind with them. In fact, probably have a bit more respect for them, then some dude that hires an application service to put them in for a tag recommended by the application service. I'm not real impressed with hunting stories that start out with, "_____(fill in the blank) application service applied me for this great tag they recommended..." To be perfectly honest, I'd have more respect for an ant-hunter saying, "I sat down with the regulation book and figured out how to apply for_____(fill in the blank tag), fronted my money, paid my fees, to save the ______(animal)." That doesn't strike me as an odd thing to do anymore than it should strike an anti-hunter to learn that we draw tags to kill wildlife. Just simply 2 philosophies on how we view wildlife."
Ok, here's where I disagree. IMO an anti-hunter that applies for and draws a limited tag is just another form of hunter harrassment. The ONLY reason that anti-hunter applied for that limited tag was to prevent a legal hunter from getting it. Hunting licenses and special tags exist for the sole purpose of allowing the holder of that license or tag to legally hunt the species of animal listed on that license or tag, and to legally possess that animal if the hunter kills one. YOU DO NOT NEED A LICENSE OR TAG to view or photograph wild animals.
I have never used an application service to apply for special tags, but I have no problem with someone who does any more than I have a problem with someone using a financial planner to invest their money. You are simply paying someone to help you reach your goal.
"That's why I don't care if a person draws a top quality tag and hunts it how they see fit. Take it as serious or as casually as they want, or choose to not hunt it at all...not my pig, not my farm. You hunt for your reasons, and I'll hunt, (or not) for mine. If I choose to only hunt a quality tag for one day, not at all, or every day of the season, its none of your concern or business. I spent nearly half of a 60 day sheep season passing on many rams this last fall that were as good, maybe even better, than the one I shot late in the season. I know, for a fact, that a majority of the tag holders would have shot several rams that my friend and I saw and passed the first few days of the season. I knew I was taking a risk of eating tag soup every time I walked away from another ram, some wouldn't have walked away from any ram (fine too). But, what I got from that hunt was much, much more than a ram...and leaving without one wouldn't have meant that I would starve, and the very last thing I would have cared about was what some random numb-nut would think if I did, or didn't kill one. I'm glad I got what I feel is a good ram, but more happy with the 26 days that I hunted and the time I got to spend there, on my own, and hunting with 2 good friends. Stories and experiences that are mine...and mine alone."
I agree 100% that if you draw a tag it's entirely your decision how hard or how long you hunt with it. BUT if you buy a limited tag fully knowing that you will not hunt with it, you are being very selfish in denying that tag from a real hunter. We are all on this planet for only a limited time, and we have an even more limited time that we are able hunt. The odds of drawing a tag in some of Montana's top sheep units are less than 1 in 300. So if someone applies for a limited tag only to prevent a hunter from getting that tag, and that person is drawn and buys that tag he is essentially taking that tag away from me or some other hunter and that IS of my concern or business.
Last year I hunted moose in Newfoundland. Newfoundland residents have to draw a moose tag. Outfitters are allocated so many tags for their clients, and I bought one of them. I hunted hard for 5 1/2 days (there is no hunting on Sundays) and I passed easy shots on 3 bulls, because I wanted larger antlers. My guide had not drawn a moose tag that year. He had commented that those young bulls would make good eating. Had I killed a moose I would have donated most of the meat to my guide, so at the end of the week I felt a little guilty for not shooting one of those bulls and giving my guide his winter's supply of meat.
"Not every game animal on planet earth needs to be on someone's wall or end up as a turd floating in the local waste water treatment plant."
Having a license or tag only allows you to hunt an animal. It doesn't guarantee that an animal will be killed. Although I buy an elk tag every year, I can't eat that much meat every year, so I only shoot an elk every few years. A few years ago I had a 5x5 bull on the hill behind my house. I still had plenty of elk meat in my freezer, so I just enjoyed watching him. A couple of days later he was lying on the side of I-90 a mile and a half from my house. Magpies fed on him for a day or two before the highway department hauled him to the county landfill. An almost total waste of a magnificent animal.
"Lots of people value wildlife for a variety of reasons, including just enjoying the fact the wildlife exist or just watching them or photographing them. I personally think if we aren't providing an ecosystem where a certain percentage of wildlife that we hunt, cant live a full life and die of old age, we're miserably failing our wildlife, and ultimately ourselves."
I see and enjoy watching wildlife almost every day. I've had wildlife art on my walls since I was a kid. Other than my taxidermy and family photos, I have more sheep art on the walls of my house that any other animals. I used to make a couple of trips to Yellowstone NP every year just to watch and photograph the bighorn sheep there. Everyone is free to do that, and you don't have to take special tag away from a hunter to do it.
Our discussion began with hunting sheep in Montana's Unlimited Bighorn Sheep Unit 300. The southern boundary of that unit is the YNP boundary. The sheep there are free to cross that imaginary line and some die there every year of natural causes or predators. I don't see any problems with the way Montana FWP are managing the sheep. The problems are in managing the people. My 2 cents...BB