A couple things that I think would be beneficial to you though-
No filters whatsoever. We all see the filtered you on TV a dozen times a year, it would be a great breath of fresh air to hear you speak directly and unfiltered instead.
How do you know I am filtered while on TV? Was I too unfiltered on your goat hunt?
Actually, I wouldn't do something like this podcast just to have more noise out on the stratosphere. It would have some edge to it.
I kind of view hunting like the NFL Players and their Union. No matter how effed up a player is, the Union protects him. Kind of like hunting. No matter how offensive and detrimental someone is to hunting, the hunting media feels they cannot hold the guy accountable for being a dumbass. I call BS on that.
Also, I'm not doing it to make everyone happy. Some people will turn it off, tell me I've lost my mind, and call my sponsors to complain. In this business, you quickly realize that if you are going to represent a group of people, doing so will come with some consequences; others will take offensive to your representation of your group. Oh well, stand in line and take a number.
I've got a few emails in my inbox that I save of guys who are coming to whoop my ass over something I wrote or said. I send them my address and tell them to come on over. So far, no takers. Just comes with the territory. Wouldn't surprise me if a podcast format and style garnered me a few more offers for a "tooth inventory."
I have built platforms on a message and a constituency of self-guided public land hunters. I'm here to do what best provides that voice. Before I would ever change that, I would fold up the tent and move on. I would have lost my value to the discussion. A podcast will be part of that if it adds to the cause. If it adds no value, well I've already got enough on my plate.