So what you're saying is that outside of two or three teams, the SEC is a fairly mundane conference. That flies in the face of the SEC,SEC,SEC mantra in that the entire conference is such a meatgrinder that in no week is there a sally opponent. So is it a tough conference or is it simply the conference who has happened to have the best team for a string of years?
For a fair comparison, wouldn't you think the record of nearly all teams going into a game ranked in the top-10 is pretty good?
Speaking of a meat grinder. Here is Bama's schedule from last year.
SEC
Auburn 3-9 / 0-8
Tennessee 5-7 / 1-7 (win against winless team)
Arkansas 4-8 / 2-6 (both wins against winless teams)
Missouri 5-7 / 2-6 (two wins against TN and winless Kentucky)
Ole Miss 7-6 / 3-5 (two wins against Ark and winless Auburn)
Miss St 8-5 / 4-4 (2 wins vs winless teams, two vs. teams who only beat winless teams)
LSU 10-3 / 6-2 (solid team, but only two wins vs SEC team with winning conf record)
Texas A&M 11-2 / 6-2 (solid team, but only one wins vs SEC team with winning conf record. Plus Bama lost)
OOC
WKU 7-6 / 4-4
Michigan 8-5 / 6-2 (solid team, but not spectacular. Only noteworthy win vs. Northwestern)
W Carolina 1AA
F_U 3-9 / 2-6
So I am curious: where is the meatgrinder? And no this is not a one year fluke. Dating back to 2007, of the 11 SEC teams that have been in "championship contention" only 3 ever played a team cross division that finished better than 0.500 in the SEC. All three finished 5-3. Essentially every SEC team that was in the chance got there because of winning their division of the SEC, and having a soft cross division schedule that year. Even this year, Alabama's cross division games are Kentucky and Tennessee, who are a combined 1-10 in the SEC. And to date they have only beaten one conference foe with a winning record, and will likely only face two for the course of the season. So again, where is the "meatgrinder" that no one else faces?