7mm08mo
Well-known member
Thanks for all the help. If they are any near as accurate I belive i will use the 200 grains as the ballistic info seems to point to more energy, and you can't have to big of gun so why not the bullet also.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
really a heavier bullet with higher B.C. will make you a better shot ???
high B.C. will not aid in shot placement knowing where the bullet you are shooting and its drop at any given yardage is what counts not high B.C.
some rifles might like a heavy bullet and that is what groups the best for you but not always . most rifles will have a cpl different bullets it likes the most for nice tight groups and b.c. is not key factor EVER
I'm going elk hunting next fall in Idaho unit 18. I will be taking my 300 rum for which I have a killer load for with 180 grain accubond over 95 grains of retumbo powder and shoots 3200fps at the muzzle and is very accurate. What do you guys reccomend or think on the two different weights of bullet?? What would you all do??
how do i do so much bullet testing and load testing you might ask
well outside my back door i have a 1,2,and 300 yrd range
belly-deep maybe do a little checking here and there to see just far off the mark you are with the idea that ONLY high bc boat tail bullets can group good at long range and flat base lower bc can not be any good at longer ranges .
http://benchrest.com/showthread.php?66876-Flat-base-vs-boat-tail
What length is your barrel and what twist do you have in it?
Are you shooting the original Accubonds or the newer LRAB? With a "killer load" I'm betting the original Accubonds because the newer LRAB have shown some issues by many.
Rem model 700 26 bbl it was 70 degrees out. 1st 3364 2nd 3307 3rd 3309 other two didn't record, as I let another person shoot it they asked never had shot one.