Foxtrot1
Well-known member
Congrats to all the guys that drew. Didn't happen for me this year.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I seem to get blamed for that with some regularity, not just in WY, but elsewhere. As is often the case, credit when good or blame when bad can be showered in undeserved portions. I doubt we have much influence on moving the draw odds in total; maybe in a specific unit when word gets out we hunted and had success in a certain place. But, even that subsides after a year.
If we have shown more people how much public land opportunity exists in the west and made public land advocates out of some of them, I'll accept the minutely lower draw odds or point creep that comes with that effort.
I seem to get blamed for that with some regularity, not just in WY, but elsewhere. As is often the case, credit when good or blame when bad can be showered in undeserved portions. I doubt we have much influence on moving the draw odds in total; maybe in a specific unit when word gets out we hunted and had success in a certain place. But, even that subsides after a year.
If we have shown more people how much public land opportunity exists in the west and made public land advocates out of some of them, I'll accept the minutely lower draw odds or point creep that comes with that effort.
I took it to mean that the increase in applicants shows there is an increasing economic reason to keep public lands from being sold off.I think he means an increase in the price of tags in order to increase revenue.
There will not be an increase in general tags. The idea is to keep Wyoming elk hunting a good, highly desirable tag...and no general areas are above bull to cow ratio's in general areas enough to support a tag increase. You don't create a good resource then kill it off to make money...ever.
I was referring to the price of the special tag but forgot to include that.
I don't see tag quota increasing, but an 800 app increase in demand for an $1,100 "special gen" tag over the last two years can't go unnoticed. Or can it?
I was referring to the price of the special tag but forgot to include that.
I don't see tag quota increasing, but an 800 app increase in demand for an $1,100 "special gen" tag over the last two years can't go unnoticed. Or can it?
Looks like I got lucky. I only had 2 points and the preference point had all the tags gone at the <4 mark. 6 leftover that went to the random with 110 applicants so I guess that makes me pretty lucky to draw!
I seem to get blamed for that with some regularity, not just in WY, but elsewhere. As is often the case, credit when good or blame when bad can be showered in undeserved portions. I doubt we have much influence on moving the draw odds in total; maybe in a specific unit when word gets out we hunted and had success in a certain place. But, even that subsides after a year.
If we have shown more people how much public land opportunity exists in the west and made public land advocates out of some of them, I'll accept the minutely lower draw odds or point creep that comes with that effort.
Randy I blamed you for my first divorce 23 years ago
Well he is a handsome guy, who can blame her!
Looks like I got lucky. I only had 2 points and the preference point had all the tags gone at the <4 mark. 6 leftover that went to the random with 110 applicants so I guess that makes me pretty lucky to draw!
About 2 days away from the tiered license fees being a thing of the past...crossing fingers.
I drew a general tag and a 37-6 tag. I also have 30 vacation days