My point was not that it was a small moose because it isn't! but rather that (I'll take it photo by photo)
1st photo: Hunter is sitting arms length away from the rack(Look at upper torso and left arm)
2nd Photo:Nothing to serve as size referance. Again NICE Moose nonetheless
3rd Photo:Look at placement of hand and then the 2nd photo, The hunter is an arms length further than the farthest tip of the rack.
4th Photo:No clue how far back he is on this one
5th Photo: Again arms length away form rack.
I have talked to a number of outfitters who show these style photos and then ask me if the (name your trophy) looks like something I'd like and when I ask them to show me photos that show the actual size they get whishy-washy and him and haw. Why? because there "Trophies" are not as big as the picture makes them out to be.
The following is a Nice older Waterbuck that while the hunter is behind the horns, the rifle gives a "point of referance" as to the size.
This to me is a GOOD trophy photo as size can be estimated realisticly.
Here is another that shows what I consider size relative photography.
Again this is just my 2 cents worth and everyone is entitled to an opionion.