funny that you mention 'facts'.... the fact is, oregon has not played the tougher teams in the conference therefore, their strength of schedule so far has been pretty weak. KSU has played all the hard people on their schedule than thus far has had a strong strength of schedule. still all this talk about the BCS and Oregon being jumped still does not justify a weak conference.
Lets just say at the end of the season that Oregon is 4 in the BCS, its still NOT a weak conference. I also doubt that you could get anyone TODAY to say that the Big 10 is stronger than the Pac. maybe preseason.... strong maybe.... that would put them 3rd. still id just like to know how even 3rd in all the conferences are weak?
Also if you want to talk about ESPN and what they think, most think Oregon should be number 2 but understand why it is the way it is today... Most people that know sports and follow them better than you and I think Oregon will play in the NCG.... this is all off my point tho about the whole conference. All im saying is that ... well, your wrong
... the pac 12 is not "weak".
Are you a politician? ha.
Facts, have you used any at this point? Link?
You don't answer any questions becasue you know you are wrong.
Why did Oregon get passed by KSU?
Why does ESPN rank the PAC #3 or #4 out of 4 major conferneces if they are so strong?
If being 3rd out of the 4 major conferences is good to you then so be it. I say being 3rd out of 4 major conferences is weak. I you are beating your chest about being better than C-usa or the Big East that is pathetic. PAC is better than the Sun Belt, doesn't prove they are not weak. Comparing yourself to the B1G is not good. They are way down at this point. That is why the B1G and PAC have the Rose bowl and the SEC and Big 12 have the Champions bowl, even matchups.
Another Fact to prove the PAC is weak.
Colorado lost to $*)Q!#@$ Sacramento St. for gods sake.
What does that say about the PAC losing to a FCS Big Sky conference team?
Almost half, 5 out of the 12 teams in the PAC won't be bowl elegible. Washington, WSU, Utah, Colorado, Cal.
1 maybe 2 out of 10 teams in the Big 12 won't be bowl elegible. Kansas and Baylor
According to my math that makes the PAC weak with almost half the tems not even bowl elegible.
Remember UCLA as PAC south champs last year, then went to a bowl with a losing record. Weak
The list goes on and on but you don't care about facts. Just your own world where the PAC is strong and Boise St should be in the national chmpionship game every year.
Lets see some facts or a link to back up your points.
Politican? ha. That was pathetic as well.
They are better than they have been for a while and have beaten some pretty good teams, no matter the amount of squeaking. That said, I'm still not convinced they are the #5 best team in the country. However, they are undefeated and have played a pretty strong schedule, though I do recognize that many of those teams "appeared" better at the time they beat them (namely Michigan and Mich St) than they appear now. That's why the BCS formula ranks them as high as they do. I see them potentially ending the season with only 2 losses (@ OK and USC). I doubt too many programs would consider that a bad year. If they can squeak out a win from either of those 2 games they will be in a BCS game, though not the title game. 
