cheeser
Well-known member
author definitely against bear spray.
but does discuss case by case results.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Confirmation bias applied to whatever issue becomes tiring and devaluing to the source, whether you apply it to your bias favoring bear spray or handguns.author definitely against bear spray.
The reply button .....mea culpa!!What’s the most effective implement for flogging a dead horse?
I bet the bears would leave you alone then!I think everyone should carry a dead horse with them in bear country.
They're pretty easy to come by also. We have many of them here on HuntTalk threads.I think everyone should carry a dead horse with them in bear country.
This is the exact definition of confirmation bias. They specifically ignored all other methods of defense to confirm pistols are good at bear defense. Truth be told yelling at a bear very likely has the similar effectiveness. Actually I seem to remember that an overwhelming number of bear charges are bluff charges and even more encounters result in no charge at all so in theory doing nothing may carry a very high effectiveness of defense. Not saying pistols aren't effective just anyone can find information to confirm their bias in something so situational.Read this, I can't believe anyone would deny the effectiveness of a gun against a bear.
![]()
Update of Pistol Defenses Against Bears 123 Cases, 98% Effective
In the 2022 update, 20 more incidents have been documented where pistols or handguns have been fired in defense against bears, with a 98% success rate for 123 total incidents.www.ammoland.com
gracias por el caballo picanteLast time I had this conversation it happened to be while on horseback. In some thick bear country, no less.
The horse died of boredom pretty quickly. I tried shooting it first to get it off it’s lazy, dead ass. No results and I ran out of ammo. I then tried to blast it with bear spray. Still nothing and so I was also out of bear spray. So I’m sitting there screaming and cussing my luck. Just then a big old griz heard the commotion and came in for the attack. Fortunately the horse was pretty tasty and it got distracted, allowing me to make my escape.
I think everyone should carry a dead horse with them in bear country.
I guess in my mind this puts an end to people saying things like "shooting them will just piss them off more" I'm sure bear spray is effective, otherwise they probably wouldn't sell much!This is the exact definition of confirmation bias. They specifically ignored all other methods of defense to confirm pistols are good at bear defense. Truth be told yelling at a bear very likely has the similar effectiveness. Actually I seem to remember that an overwhelming number of bear charges are bluff charges and even more encounters result in no charge at all so in theory doing nothing may carry a very high effectiveness of defense. Not saying pistols aren't effective just anyone can find information to confirm their bias in something so situational.
Being familiar with your defense is more important than which defense you choose...Consider this dead horse beat!
Timothy Treadwell has entered the conversationI would think a good study to figure out effective defense methods could be done if you look at all fatal bear attacks and determined how the person killed was armed.
The author stated the inability to deploy was a similar problem for all defenses. The cited cases are those where the firearm was used. Again though, he wasn’t comparing to bear spray. He even ignored cases where both a handgun and long gun were available. The author had a conclusion he wanted to make and tried to get there the best way he could. There are some other studies. The problem is once you select cases than can isolate the method and make a reasonable assumption on effectiveness, you only have a couple of dozen.I would think a good study to figure out effective defense methods could be done if you look at all fatal bear attacks and determined how the person killed was armed.
I'd wager shooting them doesn't actually happen...it's more like "oh shit" fumble getting gun out, bear bluffs, shots fired into the bushes kind of a situation. I get the same results on Tinder. They only look at times guns were reportedly fired NOT if they actually hit anything. Most and I'd be willing to wager 90% can't hit a barn if they were forced to in the time allowed in a charge situation. I'd say users of bear spray vastly outweighs users of pistol. I see hundreds of CDT hikers all with bear spray. Most throw it away either due to non-use or because they have to toss it to board a plane. The mentioned studies purposefully ignored other methods because the only were interested in their said bias.I guess in my mind this puts an end to people saying things like "shooting them will just piss them off more" I'm sure bear spray is effective, otherwise they probably wouldn't sell much!