El Jason
Well-known member
Here are my observations on two styles of boots I wore this year. I will preface all of this with the caveat I have NO brand loyalty when it comes to boots. 1) they must fit and not tear up my feet and 2) they should provide reasonable durability. Every boot brand recommendation should be couched with “if they fit your foot type”. I find “best boot” debates meaningless.
Disclaimer: I get a good discount on these through ExpertVoice. Discount or no, if they sucked I would not buy or recommend them (Lowa cough).
Pair 1 was the Zamberlan 1996 Vioz Lux GTX RR. I had to replace the insole in order to accommodate caveat #1, and since then they’ve been extremely comfortable. The last they use has a pretty roomy toebox, which I really like. The downside was the heel cup was a little sloppy once they started to break in. Superfeet fixed this issue. This is what they look like after 1 year. Not bad, as I am kind of hard on boots.

I was a little concerned they didn’t have a full rand. No need to be.

Sole wear is okay, not great. They are resoleable.


Second pair is the Zamberlan Guide 960 RR.


The sole on this one will likely wear much better. It also is a little stiffer in terms of lateral support.

I have three hunts on these, and provided they hold up as well as the Vioz, these are going to be a kickass boot.
Interestingly enough, I was more concerned about the lack of rand on the Vioz, with the sole design secondary to that. It’s quite clear that concern is a moot point, but the sole design is not optimal for extensive off trail travel in rocky terrain.
The full Vibram sole design of the Guide is much more appropriate for this type of use. The Vioz is an outstanding boot and does very well for most hunting. Lots of rocks, the Guide (or similarly designed boot) will be a better choice.
I haven’t had any issues with leaking, and have treated the with them Hydrobloc recommended by Zamberlan.
Disclaimer: I get a good discount on these through ExpertVoice. Discount or no, if they sucked I would not buy or recommend them (Lowa cough).
Pair 1 was the Zamberlan 1996 Vioz Lux GTX RR. I had to replace the insole in order to accommodate caveat #1, and since then they’ve been extremely comfortable. The last they use has a pretty roomy toebox, which I really like. The downside was the heel cup was a little sloppy once they started to break in. Superfeet fixed this issue. This is what they look like after 1 year. Not bad, as I am kind of hard on boots.

I was a little concerned they didn’t have a full rand. No need to be.

Sole wear is okay, not great. They are resoleable.


Second pair is the Zamberlan Guide 960 RR.


The sole on this one will likely wear much better. It also is a little stiffer in terms of lateral support.

I have three hunts on these, and provided they hold up as well as the Vioz, these are going to be a kickass boot.
Interestingly enough, I was more concerned about the lack of rand on the Vioz, with the sole design secondary to that. It’s quite clear that concern is a moot point, but the sole design is not optimal for extensive off trail travel in rocky terrain.
The full Vibram sole design of the Guide is much more appropriate for this type of use. The Vioz is an outstanding boot and does very well for most hunting. Lots of rocks, the Guide (or similarly designed boot) will be a better choice.
I haven’t had any issues with leaking, and have treated the with them Hydrobloc recommended by Zamberlan.
Last edited by a moderator: