Here's the short version of the story:
We were hired by Doc to guide him on the AZ Auction Tag last year. This was one of the biggest bucks we found. Chad Smith had found another buck that he thought was the biggest buck he had found. He showed us photos of his buck and we believed that his buck may have been slightly larger and so we opted to take Chad's buck with Doc last year instead of this one. Doc's buck officially scored 94 4/8 B&C last year.
We then were contacted by the raffle tag hunter. We showed him this buck and explained that we thought the buck was in the 91-92 range and obviously had "THE LOOK" of a world class buck. He chose not to hire us to hunt the buck. He instead wanted to try to find a buck on his own and I believe he was looking for one to score closer to the world record (aren't we all!).
Anyway, no one took this buck last year and we just relocated him this year. Sad story - the buck is way over the hill and in severe decline. He scores maybe 86 this year.
I'm not posting any of this to say the raffle hunter was foolish by any means - trying to do the raffle tag DIY is a perfectly noble endeavor and I applaud him for attempting it. I was just curious as to what the rest of the hunting folks would do.
Obviously I changed the scenario around a little in the original post, but it's similar enough.
smalls: I would have to import my photos into my super computer with all the quantum physics and fancy algorithms to make darn sure the buck was really big enough to shoot. Been burned one too many times by bucks that look super huge but aren't. That is, of course, if we had been "hired". If I was just tagging along for free and helping then, by all means, SHOOT NOW!
Kurt: I'd say in an overall sense that your score is pretty close to ours.