What in the last say since 9/11 makes you want to believe anything fully. Kennedy said not long ago conspiracy theories are up like 37-0.
My dude, I’m not trying to be mean spirited and hate to come across as singling anyone out on the WWW… but either your autocorrect did you wrong in the fiery finger heat of the meme chit-posting or you should be very concerned about the current administration’s attempts to obliterate the Department of Education.
Man, there just doesn’t seem to be enough of “How would I feel if that happened to me?” or “Would I be upset if the ‘other guy’ did that?” left these days.
Help me out here. The convo was about the gal's testimony. But your argument is that because you disagree with Democrats on a completely separate topic, voter ID, you also disagree with her testimony?
Americans want voter integrity. Why don't Democrats? | Opinion
Republicans should allow Democrats to exhaust themselves with the 'standing filibuster,' then pass the SAVE Act.www.usatoday.com
The reason democrats are there own enemies...CNN reported a large number of Americans favor voter id democrats and Republicans yet the democrats still will refuse to pass it. Its 2026 its not hard to get a ID to be able to vote if am not sure why this is even debated
Edited for buzzh so he can comprehend.
I think its myopic to think that this woman's testimony wasnt rehearsed and performed to push a narrative. I also think its myopic to believe all ICE agents are good and aren't breaking any laws. I think its myopic to believe any part of these protests are organic. Since I think this way im a selfish little twit. 2 wrongs never make a right and our govt is really good at convincing people otherwise.
You think all news is BS but trust what RFK’s brain worm is saying??
To enact change, yes. I’m sure she rehearsed it numerous times before she testified. That’s normal. I’m sure her agenda was along the lines of “this is messed up “. And again, if this happened to you or a family member I expect you would want change as well.
Wrong Kennedy bud.
I find it interesting that you think I have not done those things and simply came to a different conclusion than you. That because I see her testimony as more performance than genuine, I somehow lack your level of humility or decency. My thoughts have nothing to do with being wronged or slighted. Her testimony seemed manufactured and contrived. Even the video of it seemed produced and directed to achieve a desired outcome. I've watched plenty of congressional testimony and it typically consists of something you would see on C-SPAN. A wide shot from in front, no production. This looked like a low budget Hollywood production. They knew just when to zoom in to catch the quivering lips and the trembling hands. I don't believe for a minute that in the moment she thought back to George Floyd or any of the others she mentioned. I don't believe she thought they were executing people and stacking bodies in rooms. This video looked like propaganda, produced to elicit a response. And it appears it worked well. But in the end, I don't know, that was just my take. No more, no less.
Well when it acts like a nazi, talks like a nazi... guess what it is.
Did you read the article it clearly talks about dems opposition to voter ID. What I don't get is why is this a issue for dems when over 70 percent support it.
But I think its probably mostly bullshit. Body stacking give me a break! When is the movie coming out should be a blockbuster! What happened to her is not justified, but the rhetoric propaganda on top of whatever the actual truth is was not needed.
^^^ Example #1: This is how you talk when you do believe the news.
Ask any AI if the save act will make it harder for married woman to vote? IF I'm misspeaking then ignore.
Uncalled for Rainer. Keep it civil.
I did read the article. I just didn't see how it fit the current discussion. If the idea is that parties don't always support the ideas of the voters they represent, then I agree, I think that's always been the case. But I assume you remember why, or the root from which people would resist voter ID laws right? I mean the Jim Crow era was pretty brutal, and there were (and are) active efforts to prevent US citizens from being able to vote. Some people think that it is a greater "good" to prevent illegal immigrants from voting at the cost of some citizens not being able to vote. Other people think it is far more American to ensure that EVERY citizen can vote. You can take a look at how many US citizens don't have id, it ranges from about 1% have no ID at all, to 10% who's ID doesn't match their current place of residence.
This is an excellent point and can be used to draw some other parallels.
I definitely understand this sentiment, but thats a fine line. There is quite few families of dead people at the hands of illegal immigration that would probably gladly serve life as an innocent person to bring their kid back. One thing I definitely learned and believe is wide open borders cause a shit load of problems.
