bayoublaster7527
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2017
- Messages
- 733
Any interesting thing occurred to me while watching debate and testimony regarding one of the many anti-gun bills that is moving through the Colorado General Assembly, specifically the expansion of the red flag law. Many opponents frequently brought up concerns with firearms owners right to due process being violated when weapons are seized after an emergency risk protection order is granted. The action is taken without the respondent given a hearing or ability to respond. The sponsors of the bill discounted the concern stating that an emergency risk protection order protection order is a civil order and individuals are only guaranteed due process in criminal proceedings.
But those same politicians consistently criticize immigration actions as a violation of due process. But immigration actions and violations are civil also, correct?
So non-citizens who entered the country illegally should be granted due process in civil proceedings but citizens are not granted due process when it comes to firearm owners? Hard to follow the logic and hypocrisy with our elected officials in Denver. Maybe I am missing something.
But those same politicians consistently criticize immigration actions as a violation of due process. But immigration actions and violations are civil also, correct?
So non-citizens who entered the country illegally should be granted due process in civil proceedings but citizens are not granted due process when it comes to firearm owners? Hard to follow the logic and hypocrisy with our elected officials in Denver. Maybe I am missing something.
