Nongame Work Plan - Comments needed

Ben Lamb

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
20,456
Location
Cedar, MI

This is a really solid work plan laid out by the Non-game folks at FWP. It brings in some key elements of the legacy proposal that was in SB 442 (albeit on a fractional scale) but it does have the possibility to massively benefit key riparian habitats and work towards much better conditions on the land for all critters.

So, @DougStickney - to your excellent point that we put the habitat/resource first, and funding second - here's a great way to support that. ;)

Comments are due on the 24th.
 

This is a really solid work plan laid out by the Non-game folks at FWP. It brings in some key elements of the legacy proposal that was in SB 442 (albeit on a fractional scale) but it does have the possibility to massively benefit key riparian habitats and work towards much better conditions on the land for all critters.

So, @DougStickney - to your excellent point that we put the habitat/resource first, and funding second - here's a great way to support that. ;)

Comments are due on the 24th.
I might have overlooked it but it doesn’t look like any of that money focuses on mule deer. Good luck with your funding at the expense of wildlife.
 
It focuses on habitat restoration. That helps all species, nongame & game.
That’s cool and it feels good but the changes I have witnessed throughout my life the landscape has stayed the same. In my little area at least. If we restore the habitat but the wildlife are gone and not allowed to come back with current management what exactly are we doing.
 
That’s cool and it feels good but the changes I have witnessed throughout my life the landscape has stayed the same. In my little area at least. If we restore the habitat but the wildlife are gone and not allowed to come back with current management what exactly are we doing.
Exactly. We could put a billion a year into habitat in my little slice of Montana and mule deer would still be in the exact same boat they are right now. Killing more than what the resource can handle.
 
Exactly. We could put a billion a year into habitat in my little slice of Montana and mule deer would still be in the exact same boat they are right now. Killing more than what the resource can handle.

Have you looked over the season setting stuff for MD? By & large, the agency is becoming a lot more strict in mule deer mgt with several new LE permit districts being proposed, reduction in antlerless harvest and some fairly aggressive proposals in the state-wide portion.

That, in conjunction with this, is a good step forward.

Simply looking at 1 piece of the puzzle and not putting it in to context of everything else that's out there is how we continue to just pitch fits and not find solutions that work in an integrated plan.
 
> Thread created about helping great horned owls
> Becomes a Montana mule deer management thread
 
I know some great horny toad habitat. They are thriving. We don’t try to kill them though.
 
GOHUNT Insider

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
111,158
Messages
1,949,431
Members
35,063
Latest member
theghostbull
Back
Top