So, this isn’t in NM issued literature, but is what I gather via examination of actual draw results. I will use a fictitious example to make things more clear if that’s possible for someone of my abilities. If we pretend there are 20 tags for a hunt, using the NM allocation of 84% Res, 10% outfitter and 6% res, there would be 16.8 Res tags, 2 outfitter tags and 1.2 non-res tags. Rather than limit the non-res tags to one, or give the residents 17 tags, it appears as though it follows more of a quota type system where tags are issued until the quota is met but the total can not be exceeded. In the 20 tag example, the outfitter pool has exactly two tags, and that will be the result unless less than two outifitters apply. For the Res and non-Res however, there are partial tags avaialbe. The residents are guaranteed 16 tags and the non-residents are guaranteed 1 tag. The remaining tag in the 20 tag total becomes a sort of wild card. Essentially, if two non-Res tags are issued before the 17th resident draws, then there will be 16 residents, 2 non-Res and one 2 outfitters, but if 17 resident tags are issued before the second non-Res is drawn, then there will be 17 residents, 1 non-Res and 2 outfitters. The result then is that in a two person app there must be at least 17 tags available(16x.06=.96 thus 0-1 non-Res tags will be issued. 17x.06=1.02 this 1-2 non-Res tags will be issued) you will have to be there first non-Res drawn, AND you will also have to be drawn before the 15th resident. Real odds seem to be very near( nonres apps/(total tagsX.06)) divide those odds by the number of people in the party IF there are at least as many tags available as there are hunters in the party app.