Montana referendum

Blue Yummies,

You need to not drink prior to noon. I think if you go back and look I clearly stated I was not supporting I161 for a couple of reasons. One of them is I don't like the unintended consquences and I think Montana Resident hunters should fund their own access and tell outfitters they are not beholden to them for the BMA. That is not included in I161.

You refuse to ever answer a question about why outfitters dislike a free market. It is interesting that you bring me up out of nowhere as I have not posted on this thread. You have yet to answer why the industry needs to have a guaranteed anything? So what if a particular group of hunters doesn't draw in a given year, can't you market your product to others who do draw?

In addition what did you expect resident hunters to do? There has been a huge loss of access directly related to outfitter leasing. Since the animals are held in trust by the state of Montana for all Montanans and outfitters are locking out residents what did the outfitting industry expect to happen? You cannot be that dense. Look at how you and your hero big shooter talk down about every resident hunter who dares to have success.

I am not expecting any answers from you because the it is past 2 pm but it would be nice if at some point you have a sober thought that you would take the time to answer some questions unless you already know there is no defense for what the Outfitting industry is doing. If that is the case then just keep babbling incoherently.

Nemont
 
Last edited:
Back
Top