Montana Mule Deer Mismanagement

Screenshot_20260909_112137_Chrome.jpg
Not sure why youd laugh at the survey and sponsor the bill, but here we are.

The people in region 6 probably respect it, given whats happened with harvest there. Resident buck harvest used to run ~3x non-resident harvest in r 6 (2005–08), but by 2022–25 it's nearly 1:1, nr harvest exceeding r in 2025. Non-resident buck harvest roughly tripled over the ~17-year gap while resident harvest stayed flat. NR Hunter days in the region have doubled across the data set, which i understood to be a key metric in evaluating hunting pressure.
 
Me also… my answers were as follows:
Abysmal, didn’t hunt elk, and decent(my last and final answer)

Based on FWP’s interpretation of their last hunter satisfaction survey I would expect a summary of your survey answers to show that @ Eric Albus experienced satisfaction with at least two out of three categories used to determine hunter’s satisfaction with their experience….
 
Based on FWP’s interpretation of their last hunter satisfaction survey I would expect a summary of your survey answers to show that @ Eric Albus experienced satisfaction with at least two out of three categories used to determine hunter’s satisfaction with their experience….
At least the last survey could be interpreted. What are they supposed to do with "abysmal" and "decent"?

This thread (and where that survey came from, apparently) went from "how can we make changes to benefit the resource" to "who can we blame for this shit show" about 12 months ago.
 
Based on FWP’s interpretation of their last hunter satisfaction survey I would expect a summary of your survey answers to show that @ Eric Albus experienced satisfaction with at least two out of three categories used to determine hunter’s satisfaction with their experience….
The last one was multiple choice - not a lot of "intrepretation" there, unless im missing something.
 
It wasn't 3/5, it was essentially "neither" when compared to the other options which were 2 degrees of unsatisfactory and 2 degrees of satisfactory. Like a null vote that they interpreted into the positive (satisfactory) category.

Yours is a better explanation.
 
It wasn't 3/5, it was essentially "neither" when compared to the other options which were 2 degrees of unsatisfactory and 2 degrees of satisfactory. Like a null vote that they interpreted into the positive (satisfactory) category.
Regardless, it’s a childish argument. Those “neither satisfied or dissatisfied” should just be thrown out.

And here was the pic forky put out on May 1 2025
1788989150125.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
119,958
Messages
2,244,675
Members
39,063
Latest member
Mabel
Back
Top