Montana General Season Structure Proposal 3.0

@Gerald Martin - are LE districts excluded from the dates? I didnt see that covered.

Somewhere in all the reading it’s covered. LE districts will conform with archery dates to avoid conflict between archery/rifle hunters in districts where elk and deer regs may differ from permit for one species to general for the other.

LE general season will conform with late deer to capture the same season dates as currently exist and allow those permit holders to hunt through the rut.

Backcountry wilderness hunts will remain unchanged from current season dates.
 
I haven’t read the full proposal yet but it’s a hard no for me on the youth either sex from November 27-30.
I’d think most kids will probably be tagged out before that season opens. Also it keeps dads from targeting bucks and letting kids have first crack at the landscape. I’ve taken part of a couple youth hunts the first one I scouted a buck for a co workers kid for a week on the opener a 10 year old smashed a 186ā€ buck
 
I’d think most kids will probably be tagged out before that season opens. Also it keeps dads from targeting bucks and letting kids have first crack at the landscape. I’ve taken part of a couple youth hunts the first one I scouted a buck for a co workers kid for a week on the opener a 10 year old smashed a 186ā€ buck
I wouldn’t count on it and the hardo dads will take the top end off of any bucks out there. The plan is missing pick your region and nonresident caps also. It is not hard to look at fwp stats to see the majority of the harvest is during rifle season. It would definitely shift the better bucks getting harvested by youth though. I have a lot of nieces and nephews.
 
I wouldn’t count on it and the hardo dads will take the top end off of any bucks out there. The plan is missing pick your region and nonresident caps also. It is not hard to look at fwp stats to see the majority of the harvest is during rifle season. It would definitely shift the better bucks getting harvested by youth though. I have a lot of nieces and nephews.
Last paragraph of post one is really about all I got to say on all that. If I can do anything to help you let me know. I’m here for change and we think this is our best shot at introducing a change.
 
My other critique is in this is making the rifle season longer and that is where the problems start. Especially with landowner fatigue. That being said I appreciate the effort that was put in to this and I hope we get traction for change.
Landowner fatigue is real. As a landowner I would have a season in Oct no longer than three weeks long. Plenty of landowners in SE MT look south at WY with envy at the two weeks of rifle season and one month of archery. Reality is that is just not happening in MT.
It is not all bad for landowners.
Not going change much for many landowners, We already have hunters just about every day from the first of Sept to well into Dec. Adding a few days in Aug is not going to change much.
Gets rifle mule deer out of the rut. This is when most of the issues happen, when mule deer are dumb and standing next to the road all day long. This is a big plus for landowners
It is going to be busy during the overlap, but not any more busy than peak rut is now, and much of the fall there will be only half as many hunters.
If you property is primarily mule deer, you are all but done with hunting season the first week of Nov.
 
I know you all have worked really hard on this.

By this point it seems so watered down it looks hardly any different from the status quo, and the value of pushing forward seems questionable. If there are any significant differences from what is already in place, they are not obvious.

Who is your intended audience for the graphs and many paragraphs of intent and justification? I can’t imagine your average hunter will see a clear, obvious, and straightforward what and why for the proposal. I wonder how well-versed the persons in authority are about all the gritty details and nuance to understand how this works as a whole to improve things.

You all started out bold and big, and it was an exciting proposal. Over time and a lot of engagement with folks not on the forum we became aware of how deeply entrenched opposition is from so many corners, and how starkly unrealistic some very logical and reasonable changes were.

At the end of the day I sincerely hope this is a step in the right direction, or at very least the beginning of a shift away from the decades-long decline in quality elk and deer hunting opportunities on MT public land.
 
I know you all have worked really hard on this.

By this point it seems so watered down it looks hardly any different from the status quo, and the value of pushing forward seems questionable. If there are any significant differences from what is already in place, they are not obvious.

Who is your intended audience for the graphs and many paragraphs of intent and justification? I can’t imagine your average hunter will see a clear, obvious, and straightforward what and why for the proposal. I wonder how well-versed the persons in authority are about all the gritty details and nuance to understand how this works as a whole to improve things.

You all started out bold and big, and it was an exciting proposal. Over time and a lot of engagement with folks not on the forum we became aware of how deeply entrenched opposition is from so many corners, and how starkly unrealistic some very logical and reasonable changes were.

At the end of the day I sincerely hope this is a step in the right direction, or at very least the beginning of a shift away from the decades-long decline in quality elk and deer hunting opportunities on MT public land.
I disagree with your assessment.

Theres stuff i dont like (earlier archery elk), but having 3 weeks lobbed off the end of rut hunting is an improvement for mule deer.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
115,642
Messages
2,104,874
Members
37,229
Latest member
rvrtiska
Back
Top